Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 139(1)

Sec. 10(35), Sec. 10(23C), Sec. 10(23C)(vi), Sec. 139(1), Sec. 35(1)(ii), Sec. 43(4), Section 11, Section 12, Section 139, Section 28, Section 288, Section 35, Section 41

Delhi H.C : The petitioner has been denied approval under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income tax Act 1961

Avijit Das / April 8, 2019

High Court Of Delhi Manipal Academy Of Higher Education vs. Union Of India & Anr. S. Ravindra Bhat & Prateek […]

Section 139, Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 139(1), Section 147, Section 148

Bombay H.C : Did not the Appellate Tribunal err in law in upholding the proceedings initiated against the Appellant under Section 147

Avijit Das / October 25, 2018

High Court Of Bombay S. Rajalakshmi vs. ITO Section 139(1), 147, 148 Asst. Year 2007-08 S.C. Dharmadhikari & B.P.Colabawalla, JJ.

Sec. 143(1), Sec. 139(1), Section 147, Section 148

Delhi H.C : DCIT, Circle 16(2) [hereinafter referred to as the Assessing Officer (AO)] as well as the order dated 21st March, 2016 rejecting the objections filed by the Petitioner.

Avijit Das / July 13, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Mastech Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT S. Muralidhar & Prathiba M. Singh, JJ. Section 143(1), 139(1),

Sec. 44AB, Sec. 132A, Sec. 133A, Sec. 139(1), Sec. 143(3), Sec. 153A, Sec. 153C, Sec. 158BC, Sec. 158BD, Sec. 234A, Sec. 234B, Sec. 234C, Sec. 292C, Section 132, Section 142, Section 149, Section 151, Section 153, Section 292

Madhya Pradesh H.C : the AO had not recorded, his satisfaction even which the AO making the assessment of searched person was himself having jurisdiction over such other person (i.e. the assesse) and thus was not required to record any satisfaction for initiating proceedings u/s 153C in case of the assessee

Avijit Das / July 10, 2015

High Court of Madhya Pradesh CIT vs. Mechmen 11-C Section 44AB, 139(1), 132(1), 133A, 153C, 142, 143(3), 234A, 234B, 234C,

Sec. 139(1), Sec. 158BC, Section 132, Section 147, Section 148, Section 54F

Allahabad H.C : The assessing officer was justified in making the addition on transaction of long term capital gains as income from other sources, on the ground that the said information came to the knowledge of the assessing officer after initiation of proceedings under Section 147

Avijit Das / July 9, 2015

High Court Of Allahabad Dr. Shiva Kant Mishra vs. CIT Section 139(1), 54F, 132, 158BC, 148 to 53, 2(22)(e), 147,

Section 132, Sec. 139(1), Sec. 245C, Sec. 245D, Sec. 245HA, Section 139, Section 226, Section 245, Section 276, Section 276C, Section 279

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Bhopal has challenged the order passed by the Settlement Commission 26.05.2014 (Annexure-P/4) under the provisions of subsection 2C of Section 245D

Avijit Das / July 7, 2015

High Court Of Mp CIT & Anr. vs. Keti Construction Ltd. & Anr. Section 245D, 132, 153A, 143(2), 139(1), 245C(1),

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 115WD, Sec. 139(1), Sec. 143(2), Sec. 2(9), Sec.144A, Section 292BB

Allahabad H.C : the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 24.03.2009 (Annexure-5) under Section 144A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, also impugned notice dated 26.09.2008 (Annexure-2) under Section 143(2)/115WD

Avijit Das / April 3, 2012

High Court Of Allahabad Tulsi Food Products vs. DCIT Section 144A, 143(2)/115WD, 139(1), 2(9), 292BB Asst. Year 2007-08 Devi Prasad

Sec. 10(10C), Sec. 139(1), Section 147, Section 237

Karnataka H.C : Employer at the time of payment of voluntary retirement amount shall be refunded allowing the benefit under s. 89 r/w s. 10(10C) of the IT Act

Avijit Das / October 31, 2007

High Court Of Karnataka CIT vs. A. Balakrishnan & Anr. Section 10(10C), 139(1), 139(4), 147, 237 Asst. Year 2003-04 V.

Sec. 139(1), Section 139, Section 80

Gujarat H.C : Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the AO to allow carry forward of the assessed loss even though the return was filed late, in view of the specific provisions of s. 80 of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / June 15, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Dhatu Sanskar (P) Ltd. Sections 80, 139(1), Proviso Asst. Year 1984-85 J.M. Panchal &

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 139(1), Sec. 43(1), Section 139, Section 32, Section 32A, Section 72

Gujarat H.C : Whether, the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the ITO to allow to carry forward business loss, though time was not extended by the ITO for filing of return ?

Avijit Das / April 27, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Swastik Sanitary Works Ltd. Sections 32, 32A, 43(1), 72, 139(1) Asst. Year 1985-86 J.M.

Post pagination

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top