Madras H.C : Refund to assessee could not be denied merely due to issuance of notice for scrutiny under section 143(2)
High Court Of Madras Randstad India (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Large Tax Payer Unit-1, Chennai Section 237, 143 Assessment years […]
High Court Of Madras Randstad India (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Large Tax Payer Unit-1, Chennai Section 237, 143 Assessment years […]
High Court Of Meghalaya Meghalaya Cooperative Apex Bank Ltd. Vs. Chairman Central Board of Direct Taxes Section 237 Assessment years
High Court Of Orissa Orissa Rural Housing Development Corpn. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle – 1(1) Section : 139, 4, 143,
High Court Of Allahabad Rakesh Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of India Section 237, 243 Assessment Year 2010-11 Tarun Agarwala And
High Court Of Bombay Devdas Rama Mangalore vs. CIT -26 Assessment Year : 2004-05 Section : 237, 10(10C), 119 Mohit
High Court Of Madras Hema Mohnot vs. State By Chief Commissioner (Administration) Section : 276C, 237 Rajendran, J. Crl. R.C.
High Court Of Karnataka CIT, Bangalore vs. Digital Global Soft Ltd. Assessment Year : 1999-2000 Section : 237, 155, 263
High Court Of Delhi Indglonal Investment & Finance Ltd. vs. ITO Assessment Year : 1994-95 Section : 237, 143(1) and
High Court Of Madras Smt. Ramaa Sivaram vs. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Section 237, 240 Mrs. Chitra
High Court Of Karnataka Dinakar Ullal vs. CIT Section 119(2)(a), 119(2)(b), 237, 239, 244A Asst. Year 1995-96 Ram Mohan Reddy,