Section 288 – taxcaselaw.com

Delhi H.C : The petitioner has been denied approval under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income tax Act 1961

High Court Of Delhi Manipal Academy Of Higher Education vs. Union Of India & Anr. S. Ravindra Bhat & Prateek Jalan, JJ. Section 10, 10(23C), 10(23C)(vi), 11, 12, 139(1), 28, 288(2), 35, 35(1), 35(1)(ii), 41, 43(4) W.P.(C) 9996/2015 8th April, 2019 Counsel Appeared: Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv., Vikrant Pachnand, Adv. for the Petitioner.: Vikram Jetly, Adv. …

Kerala H.C : For the purposes of this section, “authorised representative” means a person authorised by the assessee in writing to appear on his behalf

High Court Of Kerala Institute Of Chartered Accountants Of India, Kottayam Branch vs. Union Of India & Anr. Sections 288, Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959, s. 2(1), Sch. II, Arts. 16 & 44, Kerala Stamp Act, 1959, s. 2(p) M. Ramachandran, J. O.P. Nos. 2470 of 1999, 28900 of 2000 & 6022 of …

Madhya Pradesh H.C : This is an application for restoration of Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 263 of 1985, which has been dismissed for default on March 11st 1987 and of Miscellaneous Petition No. 191 of 1981 dismissed for default.

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Mahaveer Prasad Jain vs. CIT Sections 251, 254(1), 256, 288 G.G. Sohani & K.L. Shrivastava, JJ. M.C.C. No. 95 of 1987 8th January, 1988 Counsel Appeared M.S. Rege, for the Assessee : R.C. Mukati, for the Revenue BY THE COURT: This is an application for restoration of Miscellaneous …

Andhra Pradesh H.C : The petitioners are also eligible to audit the accounts for the purpose of s. 44AB of the IT Act

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh A.S. Sarma & Ors. vs. Union Of India & Anr. Section Art. 226, 44AB, 142(2A), 288 Jeevan Reddy & Rama Rao, JJ. Writ Petns. Nos. 16916 of 1984 & 930 of 1985 19th January, 1987 Counsel Appeared S. Dasaratharama Reddi & S.R. Ashok for the Petitioners : K. Jagannatha Rao & …

Category: Section 288