Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 245D

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 245D

Delhi H.C : the petitioner and others were admitted by the ITSC vide order dated 7th January, 2014 under Section 245D(1)

Avijit Das / August 28, 2018

High Court Of Delhi Moin A Qureshi vs. CIT And Another Section 245D(2C) Asst. Year 2008-09 to 2013-14 Sanjiv Khanna […]

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 245D

Madras H.C : The Settlement Application filed by the petitioner was not allowed to be proceeded with and treated as invalid under Section 245D(2C)

Avijit Das / August 24, 2018

High Court Of Madras Abdul Rahim vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245D(2C) Asst. Year 2010-11 to 2016-17 K. Ravichandrabaabu,

Gujarat H.C : the assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IA in respect of undisclosed income admitted before the Settlement Commission

Avijit Das / July 25, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245D(4) Asst. Year 1999-2000 to 2004-05 M. R. SHAH

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 245D, Sec. 245F

Gujarat H.C : The department appeared before the Settlement Commission in response to the notice issued and took a stand that the application for settlement was not maintainable since on 26.12.2017

Avijit Das / April 16, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Pr.CIT vs. Vallabh Pesticides Ltd. And Anr. Section 245D(2C), 245F(2) Asst. Year 2010-11 to 2014-15 Akil

Sec. 245D, Sec. 153A, Sec. 245C, Section 132

Delhi H.C : Where once Income Tax Settlement Commission proceeds with settlement application, as per section 245D(4), proceedings before Assessing Officer come to a standstill

Avijit Das / October 9, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Radico NV Distilleries Maharashtra Ltd. Vs. CIT (Central) – III, New Delhi Muralidhar And Prathiba M.

Gujarat H.C : The Settlement Commission (‘the Commission’ for short) under section 245D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, accepting offer of settlement made by the respondents and granting immunity from prosecution and penalty

Avijit Das / June 13, 2017

High Court Of Gujarat Pr.CIT vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr. Section 245D(4) Asst. Year 2012-13 to 2014-15 Akil

Delhi H.C : Where income declared by assessee for settlement did not belong to him but were unaccounted money collected by another entity, assessee’s application for settlement was to be rejected

Avijit Das / May 15, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Vishwa Nath Gupta vs. Pr.CIT, Central Kanpur Section 245D Assessment years 2009-10 to 2013-14 Ravindra Bhat

Bombay H.C : Where assessee filed an application before Settlement Commission claiming certain expenditure as ‘speed money’ for getting clearances from different authorities, since assessee failed to offer any explanation regarding nature of said expenses, Commission rightly rejected assessee’s application on ground that it had not come with clean hands

Avijit Das / January 20, 2017

High Court Of Bombay Rashmi Infrastructure Developers Ltd. vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245D M.S. Sanklecha And A.K. Menon,

Sec. 245-I, Sec. 245C, Sec. 245D, Section 245

Kerala H.C : the Commissioner of Income Tax is not entitled to file a writ petition challenging the order of the Settlement Commission going by the scheme of Chapter XIXA

Avijit Das / January 10, 2017

High Court Of Kerala CIT (Central) vs. Settlement Commission (IT & WT) Section : 245-I, 245C, 245D K. Vinod Chandran,

Patna H.C : No order under Section 245D (4) was being passed in the case of the three applicants and that being so, the settlement applications filed by the three petitioners were rejected

Avijit Das / November 23, 2016

High Court Of Patna Lal Bahadur Singh vs. Union Of India Section 245D Ramesh Kumar Datta And Smt. Anjana Mishra,

Post pagination

1 2 … 7 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top