Category: Section 72

Madras H.C : Section 10B(6) was attracted and deduction under Section 10B was to be computed without setting off of any carried forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the earlier assessment years

High Court Of Madras Intimate Fashions (India) P. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Ofincome Tax Section 10A, 10A(1), 10A(1A), 10A(4), 10A(6), 10B, 10B(4), 10B(6), 30 to 43D, 32(2), 70, 72 and 74, 260A, 263 Asst. Year 2003-04 S. Sivagnanam & V. Bhavani Subbaroyan, JJ. Tax Case Appeal Nos. 1456 & 1169 of 2008 11th January, 2019 Counsel …

Allahabad H.C : The business of the assessee remained the same, because the criterion is not the nature of business but the unit of control and common management

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Ganga Corporation Asbestos (P.) Ltd. Section : 72 Assessment Year : 1988-89 Rajes Kumar And Shashi Kant, JJ. IT Appeal No. 141 Of 2000 April 23, 2014 ORDER Rajes Kumar, J. – Heard Sri RK Upadhayay, learned Senior Standing Counsel and Sri Ashish Bansal appearing on behalf of the respondent. …

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the Hon’ble Tribunal was justified in treating the initiation of proceedings under s. 147/148 unjustified and untenable and issuance of notice under s. 148 to be invalid for the asst. yr. 1998-99 in which the assessee was found to be owner of gold and diamond jewellery as envisaged by s. 69A of the IT Act, 1961

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Prem Pal Section 69A, 147, 148, 1997FA 68, 1997FA 71, 1997FA 72 Asst. Year 1998-99 Adarsh Kumar Goel & Ajay Kumar Mittal, JJ. IT Appeal Nos. 129, 155, 600, 640, 743 & 766 of 2008 and 83, 91, 261 & 379 of 2009 14th December, 2010 Counsel appeared …

Delhi H.C : Whether the loss determined by the AO, being different from the loss as claimed by the assessee in the return, can be carried forward in view of the provisions of s. 80 read with s. 139(3) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Nalwa Investment Ltd. Section 72, 80 Asst. Year 1995-96, Badar Durrez Ahmed & Rajiv Shakdher, JJ. IT Appeal No. 335 of 2006 6th February, 2009 Counsel Appeared : Sanjeev Sabharwal & Jagdish Rai Goel, for the Appellant : B.B. Ahuja with D.K. Verma, for the Respondent JUDGMENT RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. …

Orissa H.C : Amalgamation of OMC Alliance Ltd., the erstwhile subsidiary company with Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. became effective from 30th Aug., 1991 and not from 1st April, 1986 and consequent denying the claim of OMC for treating all the operation of the erstwhile subsidiary as that of the patent company, namely, OMC from 1st April, 1986 and resultant loss.

High Court Of Orissa Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. vs. CIT Section 72A Asst. Years 1987-88, 1988-89, 1989-90, 1990-91 A.K. Ganguly & I. Mahanty, JJ. SJC Nos. 8 to 11 of 1995 18th January, 2007 Counsel Appeared Dr. D. Pal, B. Panda, D.K. Das, S.C. Barik & B.R. Panda, for the Petitioner : Akhil Mohapatra, for the …
Malcare WordPress Security