Section 28, Section 36, Section 69

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law by not allowing the deduction of Rs. 3,50,000 under s. 28 as business loss or under s. 36 as bad debt against the said amount added as income under s. 69 which amount was neither received back nor goods against that amount were received by the appellant

/

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Satish Kumar vs. CIT Section 28, 36, 69 Asst. Year 1990-91 Adarsh Kumar Goel […]

Sec. 276C, Section 277, Section 278B

Madras H.C : The assessee under the IT Act is the petitioner in both these petitions. Criminal Original Petn. No. 27175 of 2007 is filed praying for appropriate direction directing the Court of Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate E. O. II, Chennai, to await the orders on the compounding application filed by the petitioner herein/accused in E.O.C.C. No. 151 of 1985

/

High Court Of Madras N. Athimoolam vs. Income Tax Officer Section 276C, 277, 278B, IPC 120B, IPC 193, IPC 196,

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security