Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 277

Section 276C, Section 277

Bombay H.C : Where penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) on assessee was quashed by Tribunal, prosecution under sections 276C and 277 could not be sustained

Avijit Das / December 5, 2011

High Court Of Bombay ITO vs. Nandlal and Co. Section : 276C, 277 A.P. Bhangale, J. Criminal Revision Application Nos. […]

Section 276C, Section 277, Section 278

S.C : admission is best evidence against the maker and it can be inferred from the conduct of the party

Avijit Das / May 5, 2011

Supreme Court Of India ITO, Jind Vs. Mangat Ram Norata Ram Narwana Assessment Year 1988-89 Section : 276C, 277 &

Section 276C, Section 277, Section 278B

Patna H.C : the petitioners have not bothered to mention in the present petition as to when the case was transferred to the Court of Special Judge, Economic Offences, Patna and as to whether petitioners had ever appeared before the Court below in the said proceeding

Avijit Das / February 19, 2011

High Court Of Patna Deepak Engineering Works & Ors. vs. CIT & Ors. Section 276C, 276D, 277, 278B Rakesh Kumar,

Sec. 276C, Section 277, Section 278B

Madras H.C : The assessee under the IT Act is the petitioner in both these petitions. Criminal Original Petn. No. 27175 of 2007 is filed praying for appropriate direction directing the Court of Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate E. O. II, Chennai, to await the orders on the compounding application filed by the petitioner herein/accused in E.O.C.C. No. 151 of 1985

Avijit Das / August 20, 2010

High Court Of Madras N. Athimoolam vs. Income Tax Officer Section 276C, 277, 278B, IPC 120B, IPC 193, IPC 196,

Section 276, Sec. 276C, Section 277

Madras H.C : the respondent had filed false returns of income

Avijit Das / April 30, 2010

High Court Of Madras Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. N.K. Mohamed Ali Section 276C, 277, IPC 193, IPC 196,

Section 68, Sec. 276C, Section 276, Section 277, Section 278, Section 278B, Section 279, Section 292

Madhya Pradesh H.C : the Trial Court as well as the High Court missed to notice s. 292A of the Indian IT Act containing an express bar against the invocation of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act in respect of the offence enumerated in the IT Act

Avijit Das / May 5, 2009

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Union Of India vs. Smt. Mamta Sethi & Ors. Section 68, 276C,

Sec. 269C, Section 277

Punjab & Haryana H.C: Petitioner has been convicted and sentenced by the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind, vide judgment and order dt. 30th Aug., 1996 under s. 277 of the IT Act

Avijit Das / March 3, 2009

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Parveen Kumar vs. ITO & Ors. Section 276C, 277 Asst. Year 1985-86 Kanwaljit Singh

Sec. 276C, Section 277, Section 278B

Gujarat H.C : the petitioner company filed IT return showing loss of Rs. 2,19,169 inclusive therewith audited P&L a/c and balance sheet for asst. yr. 1984-85

Avijit Das / September 21, 2007

High Court Of Gujarat H.T. Power Structure (P) Ltd. & Ors. vs. R.P. Sharma & Anr. Section 276C, 277, 278B

Sec. 271(1)(c ), Section 276C, Section 277

Madras H.C : whether there is any prima facie case against the accused to proceed with the trial in C.C. No. 127 of 1991 ?

Avijit Das / April 3, 2007

High Cort Of Madras CIT vs. Engineering Industrial Foundry Co (Firm) & Ors. Section 271(1)(c), 276C, 277 Asst. Year 1980-81

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 271(1)(c ), Section 276C, Section 277, Section 278B

Andhra Pradesh H.C : whether the proceedings against the petitioners in C.C. No. 83 of 2006 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad, are liable to be quashed

Avijit Das / March 14, 2007

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh Prabhava Organics (P) Ltd. & Ors. vs. DCIT & Anr. Section 271(1)(c), 276C, 277, 278B

Post pagination

1 2 … 10 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top