Bombay H.C : The redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000/- is allowable as business expenditure under Section 37
High Court Of Bombay Pr.CIT vs. Sushil Gupta Section 69C, 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 1988-89 Akil Kureshi & B. P. Colabawalla, […]
High Court Of Bombay Pr.CIT vs. Sushil Gupta Section 69C, 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 1988-89 Akil Kureshi & B. P. Colabawalla, […]
High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. Amritha Cyber Park (P) Ltd Section 69 K.Vinod Chandran & Ashok Menon, JJ. ITA.No.
High Court Of Rajasthan Prime Chem Oil Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Section 36(1)(viia), 40A(3), 68, 69, 115JA,
High Court Of Gujarat Kiran Ravjibhai Vasani vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Section 69, 132, 133A, 143, 148 Asst.
High Court Of Punjab And Haryana Pr.CIT, (Central), Ludhiana Vs. Prem Lal Gandhi Section 69 Assessment year 2008-09 S.J. Vazifdar,
High Court Of Madras CIT, Thiruvananthapuram v. Smt. Vasantha Anirudhan Section 271, 69 Assessment year 1990-91 Vinod Chandran And Ashok
High Court Of Allahabad Mahabeer Prasad Jain vs. CIT Section 69, 234A, 234B Abhinava Upadhya And Ashok Kumar, JJ. IT
High Court Of Gujarat Gopal Iron And Steel Co. (Guj) Ltd. Vs. ITO Akil Kureshi & Biren Vaishnav, JJ. Tax
High Court Of Delhi CIT, Central-III vs. Radico Khaitan Ltd. Section : 69A, 245 Block period 2000-01 to 2006-07 Ravindra
High Court Of Kerala Parthas Info Park (P.) Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle 1(1) Trivandrum Section 69, 147 and 148 Assessment