Delhi H.C : Acquisition of immovable property
High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Green Valley Agro Mills Ltd. Section : 269C A.K. Sikri And Ms. Reva Khetrapal, […]
Sec. 269C
Sec. 269C
Sec. 269C, Section 277
Punjab & Haryana H.C: Petitioner has been convicted and sentenced by the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind, vide judgment and order dt. 30th Aug., 1996 under s. 277 of the IT Act
High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Parveen Kumar vs. ITO & Ors. Section 276C, 277 Asst. Year 1985-86 Kanwaljit Singh
Sec. 269C, Section 269
Delhi H.C : The Tribunal has observed that the Competent Authority did not make any attempt to investigate into the more important part of the proceedings, namely, whether there was an attempt to avoid taxes
High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Smt. Kanta Kumari & Ors. Sections 269A(d), 269C B.C. Patel, C.J. & Badar Durrez
Sec. 269C, Sec. 269D
Madras H.C : The transfer of the said property was effected by an instrument of transfer dt. 24th April, 1985, in favour of five transferees and one of the transferees is the respondent herein in the appeal.
High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Mrs. Kalavathy Sections 269C, 269D V.S. Sirpurkar & N.V. Balasubramanian, JJ. TC (A) Nos.
Sec. 269C, Sec. 269D
Madras H.C : The petitioner has filed this writ petition to quash the order of the first respondent in his proceedings F. No. 1/Dec. 1985 dt. 11th March, 1988.
High Court Of Madras Vorion Chemicals & Distilleries Ltd. vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. Sections 269C,
Sec. 269C, Sec. 269D, Sec. 269F, Section 119
Punjab & Haryana H.C : The appeal filed by the transferee against the acquisition order passed by the Competent Authority, Rohtak, on 31st march, 1979, has been set aside
High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Export India Corporation (P) Ltd. Sections 119, 269C, 269D, 269F Ashok Bhan
Sec. 269C, Sec. 269D, Section 119, Section 269
Kerala H.C : Whether the circulars issued by the CBDT do supplement the statute or can supplant the same by deviating or detracting or going beyond or contrary to the statutory provisions
High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. Mathew M. Thomas & Ors Sections 119, 269C, 269D M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J.; &
Sec. 269C
Bombay H.C : This is an appeal from a decision given by Pendse, J. in Miscellaneous Petition No. 952 of 1978. The main point that is urged in the petition pertains to the time as to when the Competent Authority can exercise powers under s. 269C, IT Act, 1961.
High Court Of Bombay Amarchand Jainarain Agarwal vs. Union Of India & Ors. Section 269C S.K. Desai & B.J. Rele,
