Sec. 269D – taxcaselaw.com

Punjab & Haryana H.C : By this common order, we propose to dispose of six connected income-tax appeals bearing Nos. 1 to 6 of 1990, as common questions of law and fact are involved in all these appeals.

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Ruhi Construction Co. (P) Ltd. Section 269D V.K. Bali & Jasbir Singh, JJ. IT Appeal Nos. 1 to 6 of 1990 11th August, 2003 Counsel Appeared : A.S. Tewatia, for the Appellant JUDGMENT V.K. Bali, J. : By this common order, we propose to dispose of six connected …

Madras H.C : The transfer of the said property was effected by an instrument of transfer dt. 24th April, 1985, in favour of five transferees and one of the transferees is the respondent herein in the appeal.

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Mrs. Kalavathy Sections 269C, 269D V.S. Sirpurkar & N.V. Balasubramanian, JJ. TC (A) Nos. 1198 & 1199 of 1990; 125, 382 & 1114 to 1150 of 1991 and 8 & 9 of 1992 30th July, 2002 Counsel Appeared T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Appellant : P.P.S. Janardhana Raja, for the Respondent …

Calcutta H.C : This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt. 13th Jan., 1994, passed by a single Judge of this Court in Matter No. 2552 of 1986

High Court Of Calcutta Appropriate Authority & Ors. vs. Chandravadan Desai & Ors. Sections 269D, 269UC, 269UD Tarun Chatterjee & S.N. Bhattacharjee, JJ. Matter No. 2552 of 1986 28th September, 2000 Counsel Appeared S. Gooptu, for the Appellants : R.L. Gaggar, for the Respondents JUDGMENT S.N. Bhattacharjee, J. : This appeal is directed against the judgment …

Calcutta H.C : This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt. 13th Jan., 1994, passed by a single Judge of this Court in Matter No. 2552 of 1986

High Court Of Calcutta Appropriate Authority & Ors. vs. Chandravadan Desai & Ors. Sections 269D, 269UC, 269UD Tarun Chatterjee & S.N. Bhattacharjee, JJ. Matter No. 2552 of 1986 28th September, 2000 Counsel Appeared S. Gooptu, for the Appellants : R.L. Gaggar, for the Respondents JUDGMENT S.N. Bhattacharjee, J. : This appeal is directed against the judgment …

Madras H.C : The petitioner has filed this writ petition to quash the order of the first respondent in his proceedings F. No. 1/Dec. 1985 dt. 11th March, 1988.

High Court Of Madras Vorion Chemicals & Distilleries Ltd. vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. Sections 269C, 269D, 269G Jagadeesan, J. Writ Petn. No. 14468 of 1988 7th August, 1998 Counsel Appeared K. Mani for M. Krishna Kumar, for the Petitioner : Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, for the Respondents ORDER Jagadeesan, J. : The …

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The appeal filed by the transferee against the acquisition order passed by the Competent Authority, Rohtak, on 31st march, 1979, has been set aside

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Export India Corporation (P) Ltd. Sections 119, 269C, 269D, 269F Ashok Bhan & N.K. Sodhi, JJ. IT Appeal No. 1 of 1980 20th February, 1996 Counsel Appeared R.P. Sawhney with Ms. Aaradhana Sawhney & Atul Thukral, for the Petitioner : S.S. Mahajan & Ms. Aparna Mahajan, for the …

S.C : Whether immovable property would vest in the Central Government free from all encumbrances under s. 269-I

Supreme Court Of India Rambhai Manja Nayak & Ors. vs. Union Of India & Ors. Sections 269-I, 269D M.H. Kania, C.J., J.S. Verma, S.C. Agrawal, Yogeshwar Dayal & A.S. Anand, JJ. CA No. 3119 of 1983 17th November, 1992 J.S. VERMA, J.:This appeal is against the judgment of Gujarat High Court dt. 12th Jan., 1983 dismissing …

Kerala H.C : Whether the circulars issued by the CBDT do supplement the statute or can supplant the same by deviating or detracting or going beyond or contrary to the statutory provisions

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. Mathew M. Thomas & Ors Sections 119, 269C, 269D M. Jagannadha Rao, C.J.; & K.S. Paripoornan & K.A. Nayar, JJ. MFA No. 45 of 1982 8th October, 1992 Counsel Appeared P.K. Ravindranatha Menon, for the Appellant Mathews P. Mathew, for the Respondents EDITORIAL COMMENTS The moot question (as the first …

Gujarat H.C : Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was right in holding that initiation of the proceedings were valid?

High Court Of Gujarat Yashwantlal A. Patel vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner Section 269D A.P. Ravani & P.M. Chauhan, JJ. First Appeal No. 601 of 1988 26th July, 1988 Counsel Appeared H.M. Talati, for the Appellant : R.P. Bhatt, for the Respondent A.P. RAVANI, J. : Though labelled as first appeal in fact and in substance that …

Orissa H.C : The petitioners have filed this writ application for quashing the orders passed by the IT authorities contained in Annexures 1 and 2 and for a direction to acquire the house bearing holding No. 320/110 in Ward No. 13 in the town of Baripada under the provisions of Chapter XX-A of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

High Court Of Orissa Piramal Agarwalla & Anr. vs. CIT & Anr. Sections 269E, 269A(G), 269D H.L. Agrawal, C.J. & R.C. Patnaik, J. OJC No. 1427 of 1979 28th November, 1987 Counsel Appeared A. Pasayat, for the Petitioner : P.K. Misra, for the Respondent H.L. AGRAWAL, C.J. : The petitioners have filed this writ application for …

Category: Sec. 269D