Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 210

Sec.144A, Section 210, Section 273

Allahabad H.C :The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally right in not quashing the penalty proceedings under Section 273(2)(a) of the Act where it is admitted that no such proceedings were proposed in the draft assessment order nor any directions under Section 144B of the Act were given by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax in his order to Assessing Authority to take such proceedings in the present case

Avijit Das / January 29, 2013

High Court Of Allahabad J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs. CIT (Central), Kanpur Assessment Year : 1979-80 Section : 273, 144B, 210 […]

Sec. 194C, Section 210, Section 237

Punjab & Haryana H.C : What then is the effect of the failure to make an order of assessment, after the earlier assessment made is set aside or nullified in appropriate proceedings ?

Avijit Das / May 12, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Kamal Kishore Gupta vs. ITO & Ors. Sections 194C, 210, 237 Asst. Year 1981-82

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Challenge in this petition is to the letter issued by the Asstt. CIT, Patiala, dt. 12th March, 2004, Annex. P.2, whereby the estimate, filed by the petitioner, has been rejected and it has been required to pay advance tax in accordance with the order under s. 210(3) of the IT Act, 1961 (for short the Act), dt. 19th Feb., 2004.

Avijit Das / March 16, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Punjab Tractors Ltd. & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Sections

Sec. 273(2)(c), Section 210, Section 273

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the penal provisions of s. 273(c) of the IT Act are not attracted in this case ?

Avijit Das / January 17, 1991

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Indian Handicrafts Sections 210, 273, 273(2)(c) B. N. Kirpal & Mrs. Santosh Duggal, JJ.

Sec. 141A, Section 141, Section 209, Section 210, Section 214, Section 215

Gauhati H.C : Whether interest in a case of the present nature was payable till the date of rectification, or the entitlement of the assessee to receive interest was confined to the date of assessment first made under s. 143(3)

Avijit Das / August 16, 1989

High Court Of Gauhati Moheema Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 141A, 209, 210, 214, 215, 143(1), 143(3) Asst. Year 1977-78 B.L.

Section 210, Section 271, Section 273

Calcutta H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that in computing the penalty leviable under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, the two sums of Rs. 8,433 each paid on December 30, 1970, and March 29, 1971, respec tively, should be construed as ‘sums paid in advance under Chapter XVII-C’ within the meaning of the Explanation to cl. (i) of the said section ?

Avijit Das / March 3, 1989

High Court Of Calcutta CIT vs. Surajbhan Mahawar Sections 210, 271(1), 273(a) Asst. Year 1971-72 Suhas Chandra Sen & Bhagabati

Section 210, Section 212, Section 216

Calcutta H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee’s failure to submit revised return under s. 212(2) of the IT Act, 1961, attracts interest under s. 216 of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / July 8, 1987

High Court Of Calcutta Pasupati Das & Sons (P) Ltd.vs. CIT Sections 212, 216, 210 Asst. Year 1977-78 Dipak Kumar

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top