Section 273

Sec.144A, Section 210, Section 273

Allahabad H.C :The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally right in not quashing the penalty proceedings under Section 273(2)(a) of the Act where it is admitted that no such proceedings were proposed in the draft assessment order nor any directions under Section 144B of the Act were given by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax in his order to Assessing Authority to take such proceedings in the present case

High Court Of Allahabad J.K. Synthetics Ltd. vs. CIT (Central), Kanpur Assessment Year : 1979-80 Section : 273, 144B, 210

Section 273

Allahabad H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in upholding deletion of the penalty of Rs. 4,21,230 by the CIT(A) imposed under s. 273(2)(aa) of the IT Act,1961 by the AO whereas, the assessee has furnished wrong estimate of advance tax knowing fully well that the same was wrong and reason to believe to be untrue, since the sales-tax liability is an income of the assessee as, the same is liable to be deductible in computing against the taxable income.

High Court Of Allahabad CIT & ANR. vs. Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. Section 273(2)(aa) Asst. Year 1987-88 R.K. Agrawal &

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security