Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 209

Section 209, Sec. 209(1)(d), Sec. 234B, Sec. 234D

Delhi H.C : whether the levy of interest under s. 234B of the IT Act, 1961 for short deduction of TDS is mandatory and is leviable automatically

Avijit Das / August 30, 2010

High Court Of Delhi Director Of Income Tax vs. Jacabs Civil Incorporated Section 209(1)(d), 234B, 234D Asst. Year 2001-02, 2002-03, […]

Section 209, Section 217

Delhi H.C : No interest u/s 217 was chargeable in this case despite the fact that the assessee company did not file statement of income/estimate of income as required under s. 209A of the IT Act for the asst. yr. 1979-80

Avijit Das / September 24, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Televista Electronics (P) Ltd. Section 209, 209A, 217 Madan B. Lokur & Dr. S.

Section 209, Section 216

Bombay H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, by filing a statement under s. 209A, the assessee has underestimated the advance tax payable by him thereby reducing the amount payable in either of the first two instalments and hence liable to pay interest under s. 216 of the IT Act ?

Avijit Das / August 22, 2005

High Court Of Bombay At Goa CIT vs. Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd. Sections 209A, 216 Asst. Year 1987-88 R.M. Lodha

Section 209, Section 217

Kerala H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law and in fact in holding that interest was not leviable under s. 217(1) of the IT Act, 1961?

Avijit Das / August 26, 1998

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. English Indian Clays Ltd. Sections 209A, 217 Asst. Year 1982-83 Om Prakash, C.J. &

Sec. 141A, Section 141, Section 209, Section 210, Section 214, Section 215

Gauhati H.C : Whether interest in a case of the present nature was payable till the date of rectification, or the entitlement of the assessee to receive interest was confined to the date of assessment first made under s. 143(3)

Avijit Das / August 16, 1989

High Court Of Gauhati Moheema Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 141A, 209, 210, 214, 215, 143(1), 143(3) Asst. Year 1977-78 B.L.

Section 209, Section 218, Section 221

Delhi H.C : The dispute is regarding its liability to pay the advance tax for the asst. yr. 1988-89 corresponding to financial year ending 31st March, 1988.

Avijit Das / August 5, 1988

High Court Of Delhi J.K. Synthetics Limited vs. Income Tax Officer & Ors. Sections 209A, 212, 2(45), 218, 221 Asst.

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top