taxcaselaw.com - Page 725 of 1370 - taxcaselaw.com

Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 2(14), Sec. 2(47), Section 45

Gujarat H.C : Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the appellant was not entitled to deduction of loss of Rs. 80,000 as business loss ?

Avijit Das / January 16, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat Patel Brass Works vs. CIT Sections 2(14), 2(47), 45 Asst. Year 1986-87 D.A. Mehta & Ms. […]

Sec. 143(3), Sec. 254(1), Sec. 260A, Section 143, Section 254, Section 260

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in law to admit additional evidence and granting relief to the assessee on the basis of this evidence in violation of r. 29 of the IT (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 ?

Avijit Das / January 16, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Bank Of Punjab Ltd. Sections 143(3), 254(1), 260A, ITAT Rule 29 Asst.

Sec. 271(1)(c ), Section 69, Section 69A

Karnataka H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of s. 69A were not applicable to the present case inasmuch as when the high denomination notes of the face value of Rs. 1,35,000 were attempted to be encashed by the assessee by tendering the same to the RBI, they had ceased to remain legal tenders and had thus become valueless and in that view, in cancelling the penalty of Rs. 95,000 levied under s. 271(1) (c) ?

Avijit Das / January 16, 2006

High Court Of Karnataka CIT vs. Andhra Pradesh Yarn Combines (P) Ltd. Sections 69, 69A, 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 1978-79 H.L.

Sec. 32(1), Section 32

Delhi H.C : Whether Tribunal was correct in giving a finding that the container/tanker mounted on a vehicle was nothing but a big cylinder because it had all attributes of a cylinder ?

Avijit Das / January 12, 2006

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Goyal MG Gases Ltd. Section 32(1), RULE Appendix I, Item III(3)(v) Asst. Years 1992-93,

Sec. 254(1), Section 254

Gujarat H.C : The Tribunal while deciding the assessee’s appeal against the order passed by the learned CIT under s. 263 of the IT Act had jurisdiction to direct the AO to make proper investigation and then decide the question of allowability of additional commission in accordance with law

Avijit Das / January 11, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat Harsiddh Specific Family Trust vs. CIT Section 254(1) Asst. Year 1986-87 D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N.

Sec. 276C, Section 277, Section 278, Section 278B

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The income of the firm which has wrongly been shown as goodwill for the purpose of tax evasion

Avijit Das / January 10, 2006

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Kusumchand Sharadchand & Anr. vs. Union Of India & Anr. Sections 276C,

Section 80-I, Section 80HH

Gujarat H.C : Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that the assessee- company is an industrial undertaking for the purposes of ss. 80HH and 80-I of the IT Act ?

Avijit Das / January 9, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Prabhudas Kishordas Tobacco Products (P) Ltd. Sections 80HH, 80-I Asst. Years 1984-85, 1985-86 D.A.

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, the learned Tribunal was right in law in dismissing the appeal of the Revenue by holding that the payment was made by Shri Kulwant Singh, although the facts as found for the CIT (A) in order dt. 8th Oct., 1992, for the asst. yr. 1989-90 were different ?

Avijit Das / January 9, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Kulwant Singh & Co. Section 4 Asst. Year 1988-89 D.K. Jain, C.J.

Gujarat H.C : Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that CIT, Surat, was not justified to pass the order under s. 263 of IT Act, 1961, in the case of assessee relating to asst. yr. 1986-87 ?

Avijit Das / January 9, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Vikrant Crimpers Section 263 Asst. Year 1986-87 D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N. Devani, JJ.

Sec. 260A, Section 260, Section 32

Delhi H.C : The AO conducted an inquiry to verify the genuineness of the alleged purchase and recorded a finding that the assessee had failed to establish the purchase of the machinery

Avijit Das / January 9, 2006

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Reetu Finlease (P) Ltd. Sections 32, 260A Asst. Year 1996-97 T.S. Thakur & B.N.

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 724 725 726 … 1,370 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top