Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 261

S.C : the Office of the Chief Post Master General has shown sufficient cause for condoning the delay of 427 days in filing SLPs before this Court

Avijit Das / February 24, 2012

Supreme Court Of India Office Of The Chief Post Master General Vs. Living Media India Ltd. Section : 261 P. […]

Section 254, Section 261, Section 66

Delhi H.C : Whether it is within the jurisdiction of Income Tax Department to frame assessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961, during the pendency of trial under the Prevention of Corruption Act?

Avijit Das / January 31, 2011

High Court Of Delhi S. K. BahadurÂ vs. Union Of India Section 254(ii), 131, 161, 66(I) Asst. Year 1985-1986 A.

Section 261, Section 269

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the jurisdiction to make assessment in respect of matters arising at Bombay had not been conferred or transferred to Delhi by reference to territory or persons or classes of persons or incomes or classes of income or cases or classes of cases as contemplated by s. 120

Avijit Das / January 24, 2008

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. H.F.C.L. Infotel Ltd. Section 261A, 269 Asst. Year 1998-99 Satish Kumar Mittal

Madhya Pradesh H.C : the assessee was a person not ordinarily resident in India and had made several deposits in foreign currency in his NRE accounts in different banks in India

Avijit Das / May 3, 2006

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Purshottam Khatri vs. CIT Section 261 Asst. Years 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95, 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98 A.K.

Section 261, Section 263

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessment order passed by the ITO without initiating penalty proceeding under s. 273 for committing breach of s. 212(3A) by the assessee, was not erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue within the meaning of s. 263 of the IT Act, 1961?

Avijit Das / September 1, 2004

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Surendra Prasad Agrawal Sections 261, 263, ART. 141 Asst. Year 1977-78 R.K. Agrawal &

Sec. 2(1A), Section 2, Section 261, Section 80HHC

Gauhati H.C : Whether in the computation of the composite income derived from sale of tea grown and manufactured by the seller and exported out of India under s. 2(1A)

Avijit Das / August 24, 2004

High Court Of Gauhati Bazaloni Group Ltd. & Ors. vs. CIT Section 2(1A), 80HHC, 261, Rule 8 Asst. Year -1989-90

Karnataka H.C : Petitioner, an assessee under the IT Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short), sought to avail of the benefits of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 (‘the Scheme’ for short), as formulated by Finance (No. 2) Act of 1998.

Avijit Das / January 7, 2004

High Court Of Karnataka Mangilal S. Jain vs. CIT & Anr. Sections 261, Art. 133, Art. 136, 1998FA(No. 2) 90(2)

Sec. 119(2)(b), Section 119, Section 261

S.C : Whether the time for payment fixed under s. 67 of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997

Avijit Das / November 28, 2002

Supreme Court Of India Hemalatha Gargya vs. CIT & Anr. Section 119(2)(b), 261, Art. 136, 1997FA 66, 1997FA 67 Mrs.

S.C : the Special Leave Petition against the judgment followed by the High Court in the order under appeal was dismissed as also Special Leave Petitions against the judgments of various High Courts taking a similar view.

Avijit Das / August 28, 2001

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Ambur Co-Op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Section 261 S.P. Bharucha, C.J.; Y.K. Sabharwal & Ashok

Madras H.C : The deduction of urban land tax relating to the earlier previous years is allowable as a deduction in computing the income from property for the year in which the tax paid on the basis of the provision under s. 24(1)(vii)

Avijit Das / February 27, 2001

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. M. Ranjitmal Chordia Section 261 R. Jayasimha Babu & N.V. Balasubramanian, JJ. SCP No.

Post pagination

1 2 … 4 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top