Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 119(2)(b)

Sec. 119(2)(b), Section 119, Section 237

Bombay H.C : There is no provision under the Act to refund the amount to a person who is not an assessee or a deemed assessee

Avijit Das / October 28, 2005

High Court Of Bombay BASF (India) Ltd. & Anr. vs. W. Hasan, CIT & Ors. Sections 119, 119(2)(b), 237 Asst. […]

Sec. 119(2)(b), Section 119

Patna H.C : Both the matters are connected ones and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. By order dated 30th Jan., 2003, the CBDT has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for condonation of the delay in filing the application under s. 119(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for refund.

Avijit Das / July 2, 2003

High Court Of Patna Deep Narayan Gupta vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes & Ors. Sections 119(2)(b), 237 Asst. Year

Sec. 119(2)(b), Section 119, Section 261

S.C : Whether the time for payment fixed under s. 67 of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997

Avijit Das / November 28, 2002

Supreme Court Of India Hemalatha Gargya vs. CIT & Anr. Section 119(2)(b), 261, Art. 136, 1997FA 66, 1997FA 67 Mrs.

Sec. 11(2), Sec. 119(2)(b), Section 119

Gujarat H.C : The petitioner also filed an application under s. 119(2)(b) of the Act for condonation of delay in giving notice under s. 11(1) r/w Expln. 2 to s. 11 of the Act and for late filing of returns before respondent No. 2.

Avijit Das / July 24, 2002

High Court Of Gujarat Gujarat Institute Of Desert Ecology vs. CIT Sections 11(2), 119(2)(b) Asst. Year 1996-97, 1997-98 M.S. Shah

Sec. 119(2)(b), Section 119

Gujarat H.C : Having regard to the facts of the case and in view of joint request made by the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing today.

Avijit Das / January 10, 2001

High Court Of Gujarat Gujarat Electric Co. Ltd. vs. CIT & Anr. Sections 119(2)(b), 237 Asst. Year 1990-91, 1991-92 J.M.

Sec. 119(2)(b), Section 119, Section 154

Kerala H.C : Whether there was sufficient cause for condonation of delay or not is a matter within the discretion of the Board. The Board considered the matter and found that there was no ground for condonation of the delay

Avijit Das / August 21, 1998

High Court Of Kerala A.P. Sivaraman & Ors. vs. ITO & Ors. Sections 119(2)(b), 154 Om Prakash, C.J. & J.B.

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top