Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 68

GST Caselaws, Section 129, Section 68

Allahabad H.C : Where Competent Authority had seized goods of assessee under transport as well as vehicle on account of non filing of Part-B of E-way bill, said authority was directed to release goods and vehicle on assessee furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee equivalent to proposed tax

Avijit Das / June 6, 2018

High Court Of Allahabad New Shiva Transport Service vs. State of U.P. Section 68, 129 Pankaj Mithal And Jayant Banerji, […]

GST Caselaws, Sec. 66B, Section 66, Section 68, Section 9

S. C : Where under a lease arrangement between Government (lessee) and lessor, lessee took liability to bear obligation of registration charges, stamp duty, service tax etc. (if applicable) towards hiring of lease premises, lessee to pay service tax despite liability of lessor

Avijit Das / November 7, 2017

Supreme Court Of India Union of India vs. Bengal Shrachi Housing Development Ltd. Section Â 9, 66B, 66, 68 R.F. Nariman

GST Caselaws, Sec. 65(50b), Section 68, Section 9

CESTAT-Mumbai : Where appellant company made reimbursement to its associate company for providing internet services to it on basis of usage, same was liable to tax under reverse charge mechanism

Avijit Das / September 25, 2017

CESTAT Mumbai Bench Vishay Components India (P.) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III Section : 9, 68, 65(50b) Period

Delhi H.C : The ITAT was correct in law in deleting the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of four individuals when the genuineness of the transactions and the creditworthiness of the said four individuals were in serious doubt

Avijit Das / August 25, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Pr.CIT-7 vs. Bikram Singh Section 68 Assessment year 2011-12 Muralidhar And Prathiba M. Singh, JJ. IT

Bombay H.C : Where assessee failed to produce relevant documents and confirmation in respect of loan taken from various parties, mere fact that he did not maintain proper books of account could not be accepted as a valid plea and, thus, amount in question was to be added to assessee’s taxable income under section 68

Avijit Das / August 24, 2017

High Court Of Bombay Arunkumar J. Muchhala vs. CITâ€“8 Section 68 Assessment year 1996-97 S.C. Dharmadhikari And Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi,

Bombay H.C : The amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- cannot be assessed as ‘undisclosed’ income of the assessee

Avijit Das / December 23, 2016

High Court Of Bombay CIT, Bombay City-I, Bombay vs. Likproof India (P.) Ltd. Section 68 M.S. Sanklecha And A.K. Menon,

Delhi H.C : The assessee was subjected to re-assessment for Assessment Year (AY) 2003-04

Avijit Das / August 31, 2016

High Court Of Delhi Pr.CIT-8 vs. Softline Creations (P.) Ltd. Section 68 Assessment Year 2003-04 S. Ravindra Bhat And Ms.

Bombay H.C : The Tribunal was correct in cancelling the order u/s. 263 and in passing the said order whether it was justified in relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of CIT v. Gabriel India Ltd. [1993] 203 ITR 108

Avijit Das / June 16, 2016

High Court Of Bombay CIT, Central-III vs. Nirav Modi Section 68, 263 Assessment Years : 2007-08 And 2008-09 M.S. Sanklecha

Delhi H.C : Whether the finding arrived at by the Tribunal is perverse in view of the material placed before the Tribunal and the lower authorities?

Avijit Das / February 4, 2015

High Court Of Delhi Sarita Aggarwal vs. ITO Section : 68 Assessment Year : 1994-95 Sanjiv Khanna And V. Kameswar

Section 68, Section 147, Section 148, Section 69A, Section 72

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the Hon’ble Tribunal was justified in treating the initiation of proceedings under s. 147/148 unjustified and untenable and issuance of notice under s. 148 to be invalid for the asst. yr. 1998-99 in which the assessee was found to be owner of gold and diamond jewellery as envisaged by s. 69A of the IT Act, 1961

Avijit Das / December 14, 2010

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Prem Pal Section 69A, 147, 148, 1997FA 68, 1997FA 71, 1997FA 72

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top