January 1998

Sec. 256(2), Section 256

S.C : Whether, in law and on facts, the Tribunal is right in confirming the view taken by the CIT(A) on directing the ITO to recompute the capital gains on the basis of the principles laid down by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B.C. Srinivasa Setty (1981) 21 CTR (SC) 138 : (1981) 128 ITR 294 (SC) : TC 20R.148 ?

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. N. Kishore Settlement Section 256(2) S.C. Agrawal, K. Venkataswami & A.P. Misra, JJ. Civil

Income Tax Case Laws

Madras H.C : The aggrieved assessee-temple agitated the matter further by filing an appeal before the Tribunal, as stated above. Before the Tribunal, the assessee-temple, it appears, produced the exemption certificate obtained from the IT Department under s. 11 of the IT Act as relatable to non-agriculturists for the year ending 30th June, 1990.

High Court Of Madras State Of Tamil Nadu vs. Ezhumeswaramudayar Temple Sections Art 13, Art 246, Art 265, Art 366(1),

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security