Section 281 Attachment Order Void if Notice to Transferee Not Given: Gujarat High Court
Add to cart Uncategorized Pay for This Post Rated 0 out of 5 ₹100.00 Add to cart Buy this post
Add to cart Uncategorized Pay for This Post Rated 0 out of 5 ₹100.00 Add to cart Buy this post
High Court Of Madras Sri Sivalaya Advances vs. Tax Recovery Officer Section : 156, 281 Asst. Year : 2005-06 to
High Court Of Gujarat Nitaben Harishbhai Shah vs. Tax Recovery Officer Section 158BC(d), 281 Harsha Devani & A.S. Supehia, JJ.
High Court Of Gujarat Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd., In Re Assessment Year : 2003-04 Section : 281 K. A. Puj,
High Court Of Karnataka CIT vs. Karnataka State Industrial Investment Development Corporation Ltd. Section : 222, 281 Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Supreme Court Of India Department of Income-tax vs. Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd. Section : 281 Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla And
High Court Of Allahabad Dr. Manoj Kabra VS ITO Section : 281 Tarun Agarwala And Bachchoo Lal, JJ. Writ Tax
High Court Of Gujarat Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd. vs. DIT Section : 281, 391, 394 P.B. Majmudar And Mohinder Pal,
High Court Of Bombay Firoz Tin Factory VS. ACIT Section : 220, 281B Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud And M.S. Sanklecha,
High Court Of Gujarat Tax Recovery Officer vs. Industrial Finance Corporation of India Assessment Years : 1996-97, 1998-99 To 2001-02