Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 281B

Section 281B, Section 195

S.C : Letters of Credit issued by Indian Bank on behalf of a resident party dealing with a foreign party can be provisionally attached under section 281B

Avijit Das / August 25, 2017

Supreme Court Of India Royal Bank of Scotland PLC Vs. Axis Bank Ltd. Section 281B, 195 A.K. Sikri And Ashok […]

Section 281B, Section 139, Section 147, Section 148

Delhi H.C : The present writ petitions have been filed by NDTV Ltd. (hereinafter, “NDTV”) against the notice proposing reassessment proceedings initiated by the Commissioner of Income Tax (hereinafter, “Respondent” or “CIT” or “Revenue”) under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter, “Act”) and the order of provisional attachment of Petitioner’s assets under Section 281B

Avijit Das / August 10, 2017

High Court Of Delhi New Delhi Television Ltd. vs. DCIT & Anr. Section 281B, 139, 147, 148 Asst. Year 2008-09

Madras H.C : Where property, which is subject matter of provisional attachment, is sufficient to satisfy tax liability and safeguard interest of revenue, petitioner can seek release of provisional attachment in respect of other properties and amounts due from debtors and depositors

Avijit Das / April 2, 2013

High Court Of Madras KDH Properties (P.) Ltd. vs. ACIT, Co. Circle-II (4), Chennai Assessment Year : 2011-12 Section :

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the bank accounts of the petitioner were provisionally attached in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 281- B

Avijit Das / January 29, 2013

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana Nirmal Singh vs. Union Of India And Others Section 281-B Hemant Gupta & Ritu

Delhi H.C : grant of refund on expiry of provisional attachment under section 281B

Avijit Das / January 10, 2011

High Court Of Delhi VLS Finance Ltd.Vs. ACIT Assessment Years 1998-99 To 2000-01 Section : 281B Dipak Misra, C.J.Â And

Section 226, Section 281B

Allahabad H.C : Whether on facts, encashment of fixed deposits on expiry of period of bank guarantee and cessation of provisional attachment, which otherwise was illegal and in no way authorized encashment of fixed deposits, was totally unjustified

Avijit Das / March 30, 2010

High Court Of Allahabad Gopal Das Khandelwal vs. Union of India Section : 226, 281B Rajes Kumar And Pankaj Mithal,

Section 281, Section 281B

Rajasthan H.C : The respondents IT authorities had erred in making a provisional attachment of 3 FDRs of Rs. 1 crore of the petitioner vide the impugned attachment order dt. 17th April, 2007 passed under s. 281B of the IT Act

Avijit Das / July 20, 2007

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench Jagdish Sharma vs. Union Of India & Ors. Section 281B Dr. Vineet Kothari,

Section 28, Section 281B

Allahabad H,C : the seized bank accounts stand in the name of the petitioner-company

Avijit Das / December 14, 2005

High Court Of Allahabad Raghuram Grah (P) Ltd. & Anr. vs. Income Tax Officer & Ors. Section 281B A.K. Yog

Section 281, Section 281B

Calcutta H.C : The petitioners have basically challenged orders of attachment dt. 30th May, 1997 and 2nd Nov., 1999. The former one is provisional order of attachment under s. 281B

Avijit Das / May 13, 2005

High Court Of Calcutta Electro Zavod (India) (P) Ltd. & Ors. vs. CIT & ORS. Sections 281, 281B, Kalyan Jyoti

Section 218, Section 281, Section 281B

Madras H.C : The petitioner has prayed for quashing the order bearing G.I. No. 4-S of 1995-96 and 1996-97, dt. 27th Nov., 2002, issued under s. 281B

Avijit Das / January 28, 2003

High Court Of Madras Seshasayee Paper & Boards Ltd. vs. CIT & ORS. Sections 281B Asst. Year 1995-96, 1996-97 P.K.

Post pagination

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top