Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Gujarat High Court

Sec. 18(1)(a), Section 18, Wealth Tax Act

Gujarat H.C : Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on fact in holding that no penalty under s. 18(1)(a) of the WT Act for delay in submission of the WT return can be levied for the period till the date of furnishing of IT return by the assessee ?

Avijit Das / December 8, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Maharaja Daljit Singhji Section WT 18(1)(a) Asst. Year 1978-79, 1979-80 D.A. […]

Sec. WT 5(1)(xxa), Section 5, Wealth Tax Act

Gujarat H.C : Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in allowing claim of exemption under s. 5(1)(xxa) of the Act in respect of shares of various companies worth Rs. 10,11,686 ?

Avijit Das / December 2, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. C.D.R. Laxmidevi Section WT 5(1)(xxa) Asst. Year 1981-82 D.A. Mehta &

Sec. 40A(3), Section 40A, Section 69

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, both the CIT(A) and Tribunal are right in view in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,11,015 as made by the ITO on account of suppression of stock of steel rounds ?

Avijit Das / November 30, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. P. Pravin & Co. Sections 40A(3), 69, Rule 6DD(J) Asst. Year 1979-80 D.A. Mehta

Sec. 40A(3), Section 69

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, both the CIT(A) and Tribunal are right in view in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,11,015 as made by the ITO on account of suppression of stock of steel rounds ?

Avijit Das / November 30, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. P. Pravin & Co. Sections 40A(3), 69, Rule 6DD(J) Asst. Year 1979-80 D.A. Mehta

Sec. 2(7), Sec. 2(7)(c), Sec. 28(i), Section 145

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in setting aside the order passed by the CIT under s. 263 of the IT Act and thereby restoring the order passed by the ITO ?

Avijit Das / November 25, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Advance Construction Co. (P) Ltd. Sections 1981FA 2(7)(c), 28(i), 145 Asst. Year 1982-83 D.A.

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that retention remuneration received by the assessee in foreign currency from his foreign employer was liable to be included in the total income of the assessee ?

Avijit Das / November 25, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat Emmerich Jaegar vs. CIT Sections : DTAA between India & Austria, ART. 14, 90 D.A. Mehta

Income Tax Case Laws

Gujarat H.C : Show-cause notice dt. 6th April, 1995 was issued to the petitioner No. 1 company, calling upon to show cause as to why central excise duty amounting to Rs. 5,06,940 should not be recovered from it. The said demand was confirmed by the learned Addl. CCE in order in original dt. 25th May, 1998, against which the petitioner No. 1 company had filed appeal before the Commr.(A) on 3rd Sept., 1998

Avijit Das / October 6, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat B & Brothers Engineering Works & Anr. vs. Union Of India Section FA (No. 2) 1998

Gujarat H.C : the assessee will get an opportunity to challenge the same by filing a writ petition so that he does not have to wait till completion of the reassessment proceedings which would have entailed the liability to pay tax and interest on reassessment and also to go through the gamut of appeal

Avijit Das / August 19, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat Arvind Mills Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Wealth Tax Section 17 Asst. Year 1997-98 M.S. Shah

Gujarat H.C : The petitioner filed the form under s. 269UC on 25th May, 1992, and the Appropriate Authority at Ahmedabad, respondent No. 2 herein, passed the order under s. 269UD(1) for acquiring the property in question after deducting Rs. 71,491 by way of discount for accelerated payment

Avijit Das / August 19, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat Ratilal H. Nayak vs. Union Of India Section 269UG(4) M.S. Shah & D.A. Mehta, JJ. Special

Section 145, Section 263

Gujarat H.C : Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the CIT has validly exercised revisional jurisdiction under s. 263 of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / August 6, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat Kwality Steel Suppliers vs. CIT Sections 145, 263 Asst. Year 1993-94 M.S. Shah & D.A. Mehta,

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 57 58 59 … 89 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top