S.C : There would be no question of inviting the penalty under s. 271(1)(c)
Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. Section 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 2001-02 V.S. Sirpurkar & Dr. Mukundakam […]
Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. Section 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 2001-02 V.S. Sirpurkar & Dr. Mukundakam […]
Authority For Advance Rulings ABB Ltd., IN RE Section 9(1)(vi), 195, DTAA between India & Switzerland, art. 7, DTAA between
Supreme Court Of India Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT Section 37(1), 43A Asst. Year 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94,
High Court Of Madras Smt. Ramaa Sivaram vs. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Section 237, 240 Mrs. Chitra
Authority For Advance Rulings Aramco Overseas Company Bv, In Re Section 5(2), 9(1)(i), Expln. 1(b) P.V. Reddi, J., Chairman; J.
Authority For Advance Rulings Wavefield Inseis Asa, In Re Section 9(1)(vii), 44BB, 44DA, 115A P.V. Reddi, J., Chairman; J. Khosla,
Authority For Advance Rulings Real Resourcing Ltd., In Re Section 90, DTAA between India & UK, art. 5, DTAA between
Supreme Court Of India Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. Section 36(1)(iii), 37(1), 43A Asst. Year
Authority For Advance Rulings Seagate Singapore International Headquarters (P) Ltd., In Re Section 90, DTAA between India & Singapore, Art.
Authority For Advance Rulings Joint Stock Company Foreign Economic Association “TECHNOPROMEXPORT”, In Re Section 9, 90, DTAA between India &