Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

297 ITR

Bombay H.C : the present prosecution was launched on 28th Feb., 1990 when failure to deduct tax was no longer an offence, in other words, it was not an offence at the time when the prosecution was launched

Avijit Das / August 9, 2007

High Court Of Bombay A. Shenoy & Co. & Ors. vs. N.D. Kadam, ACIT & Ors. Section 279B Asst. Year […]

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal is correct in law to set aside the order of CIT passed under s. 263, holding that it was based on mere suspicion and surmises ?

Avijit Das / July 20, 2007

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Mahendra Kumar Bansal Section 263 Asst. Year 1983-84 to 1985-86 R.K. Agrawal & Vikram

Sec. 23(1)(b), Section 23

Rajasthan H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in allowing the claim of Rs. 33,074 on account of stamp duty and registration charges from the annual letting value by holding that the provisions of s. 23(1)(b) contemplates annual rent received or receivable by the owner of the property ?

Avijit Das / May 15, 2007

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench CIT vs. Premnath Motors (Raj.) (P) Ltd. Section 23(1)(b) Asst. Year 1985-86 R.M.

Sec. 260A, Section 11, Section 12, Section 13, Section 260

Delhi H.C : the assessee has advanced huge amounts to M/s Punj Lloyd Ltd. and as such he raised a query as to why s. 13(l)(c) r/w s. 13(2)(a)

Avijit Das / May 14, 2007

High Court Of Delhi Pt. Kanahya Lal Punj Charitable Trust vs. Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) Section 11, 12, 13(1)(c),

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal was justified in law in allowing the benefits of s. 54F to an assessee who owned another residential house on the date of transfer ?

Avijit Das / April 25, 2007

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Ajitsingh Khajanchi Section 54F Deepak Verma & S.K. Kulshrestha, JJ.

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the CIT(A) was not obliged to do so, on a motion made by the ITO in that regard.

Avijit Das / April 20, 2007

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Goel Die Cast Ltd. vs. CIT (APPEALS) & Anr. Section 251 Asst. Year 2004-05

Sec. 271(1)(c ), Section 276C, Section 277

Madras H.C : whether there is any prima facie case against the accused to proceed with the trial in C.C. No. 127 of 1991 ?

Avijit Das / April 3, 2007

High Cort Of Madras CIT vs. Engineering Industrial Foundry Co (Firm) & Ors. Section 271(1)(c), 276C, 277 Asst. Year 1980-81

Sec. 132B, Section 132

Delhi H.C : which the assessment is completed is the relevant date after which interest will cease to run for the purpose of s. 132B; and thereafter interest is to be calculated under s. 244A

Avijit Das / April 2, 2007

High Court Of Delhi Ajay Gupta vs. CIT Section 132B(4) Asst. Year Block period 1st April, 1996 to 1st July,

Sec. 37(1), Section 35D, Section 42

Madras H.C : The expenditure is not allowable as a deduction in computing the income for the previous year, the Tribunal ought not to have directed the grant of allowance of the aforesaid expenditure on the principle of amortization

Avijit Das / March 14, 2007

High Court Of Madras Cairn Energy (India) Ltd. vs. JCIT Section 35D, 37(1), 42, 143(1)(a) Asst. Year 1996-97 P.D. Dinakaran

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 271(1)(c ), Section 276C, Section 277, Section 278B

Andhra Pradesh H.C : whether the proceedings against the petitioners in C.C. No. 83 of 2006 on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad, are liable to be quashed

Avijit Das / March 14, 2007

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh Prabhava Organics (P) Ltd. & Ors. vs. DCIT & Anr. Section 271(1)(c), 276C, 277, 278B

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top