Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

269 ITR

Sec. 260A, Sec. 36(1)(iii), Section 260

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the assessee-company against the order of the Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short “the Tribunal”), dt. 20th June, 2002, for the asst. yrs. 1990-91 and 1991-92.

Avijit Das / May 13, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana S.A. Builders Ltd. vs. CIT & ANR. Section 36(1)(iii), 260A Asst. Year 1990-91, 1991-92 […]

Section 143, Section 250

Rajasthan H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that scope of assessments made by the ITO in pursuance of the directions issued under s. 250 of the IT Act by the AAC was limited and the ITO was not competent to include in the taxable income the amount of Rs. 4,29,593 when at the time of original assessment, the same was not included?

Avijit Das / May 7, 2004

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench CIT vs. Mahindra & Co. Sections 143, 250 Y.R. Meena & Shashi Kant

Sec. 11(1)(a), Section 11

Delhi H.C : Whether the assessee-institution could be said to have applied (within the meaning of s. 11(1) (a) of IT Act) to its specified charitable purposes the entire amount of Rs. 12 lakhs each gifted by the assessee to two donee trusts with the specific direction that in each donee’s case Rs. 8 lakhs was to form part of the corpus of the respective donee trust?

Avijit Das / May 6, 2004

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Shri Ram Memorial Foundation Section 11(1)(a) Asst. Year 1977-78 B.C. Patel, C.J. & Badar

Sec. 256(2), Section 256

Madhya Pradesh H.C : This is an application made by the Revenue (IT Department) under s. 256(2) of the IT Act, requesting this Court to call for the reference on the question proposed for being answered by this Court under s. 256(1) of the IT Act.

Avijit Das / May 6, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Ajay Kumar Shankar Lal Agarwal Section 256(2) A.M. Sapre &

Section 145, Section 69

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, there is any legal material for the conclusion of the Tribunal that there is concealment of sale to the extent of Rs. 1,40,340 ?

Avijit Das / April 30, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Ladha Traders vs. CIT Sections 69, 145 Asst. Year 1980-81 A.M. Sapre

Bombay H.C : The petitioner is a citizen of India and is a resident of Mumbai. In the month of August, 1987, she won a lottery of the Government of Sikkim having a prize money of Rs. 6,30,000.

Avijit Das / April 29, 2004

High Court Of Bombay Nirmala L. Mehta vs. A. Balasubramaniam, Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. Sections ART. 265, ART.

Income Tax Case Laws

Calcutta H.C : By this writ application the petitioner has challenged an order dt. 6th April, 2004, and the notice dt. 7th April, 2004, and the proceedings pending in relation thereto.

Avijit Das / April 29, 2004

High Court Of Calcutta Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. vs. Union Of India & Ors. Section 226(3), ART. 226 Kalyan

Madhya Pradesh H.C : This is an application made by the assessee under s. 256(2) of the IT Act requiring the Tribunal to refer the question of law proposed by the assessee for being answered by this Court under s. 256 (1) of the IT Act.

Avijit Das / April 28, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench State Bank Of Indore vs. CIT Section 256(2) Asst. Year 1973-74, 1974-75,

Sec. 132(1), Section 132

Calcutta H.C : The common grievance of the petitioners is that despite presentation of the managers’ cheques, the bank authorities are not honouring because of the preventive and obstructive action being taken by the Revenue authorities

Avijit Das / April 27, 2004

High Court Of Calcutta Windson Electronics (P) Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union Of India & Ors. Sections 132(1), 132(3), 132(8A)

Sec. 260A, Section 260

Madhya Pradesh H.C : We have heard, counsel for appellant on the question of admission, against an order dt. 16th July, 2003 passed by the Tribunal in ITA No. 263/Ind/1997 in this second appeal filed by the Revenue under s. 260A of the IT Act.

Avijit Das / April 26, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Vijaykumar Rajendra Kumar & Co. Sections 260A A.M. Sapre &

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 … 11 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top