257 ITR

Sec. 37(3A), Sec. 37(3b), Section 5

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the rejection of method of accounting of interest on sticky loans credited to “interest suspense account” consistently followed by the assessee in the asst. yr. 1961-62 onwards and accepted by the Department?

/

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench State Bank Of Indore vs. CIT Sections 5, 37(3A), 37(3B) Asst. Year […]

Sec. 37(3A), Sec. 37(3b), Section 5

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the rejection of method of accounting of interest on sticky loans credited to “interest suspense account” consistently followed by the assessee in the asst. yr. 1961-62 onwards and accepted by the Department?

/

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench State Bank Of Indore vs. CIT Sections 5, 37(3A), 37(3B) Asst. Year

Sec. 260A, Section 260

Delhi H.C : CM 52/02 Allowed subject to just exceptions. ITA 129/02 Order dt. 11th July, 2001, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (for short ‘the Tribunal’), in ITA Nos. 333 & 445/Del/1993, pertaining to the asst. yr. 1990-91 is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal under s. 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’).

/

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Greater Delhi Planners (P) Ltd. Section 260A Asst. Year 1990-91 D.K. Jain & Ms.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security