Gujarat H.C : the entire expenditure of Rs. 39,24,979 was not eligible for weighted deduction under s. 35C
High Court Of Gujarat Kaira Dist. Co-Op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 28 & 35C Asst. Year 1976-77 […]
Sec. 35C, Section 28
Sec. 35C
Sec. 35C
Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessee was not entitled for weighted deduction under s. 35C on a sum of Rs. 2,74,201 ?
High Court Of Delhi Gangeshwar Ltd. vs. CIT Section 35C Asst. Year 1975-76 Arijit Pasayat, C.J. & D.K. Jain, J.
Sec. 35C
Madras H.C : The assessee is entitled for weighted deduction under s. 35C in respect of the expenditure incurred by way of salary, bonus, ex gratia production incentive, etc. to the employees who are involved in the purchase of sugarcane, is, therefore, answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Sakthi Sugar Ltd. Section 35C R. Jayasimha Babu & C. Nagappan, JJ. Tax Case
Sec. 32(1), Sec. 35C, Sec. 37(1), Sec. 43(1), Sec. 43(3), Section 32, Section 32A, Section 35, Section 37, Section 43
Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in its interpretation and application of s. 35C of the IT Act, 1961 ?
High Court Of Gujarat Mehsana District Co-Operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 32(1), 32A, 35C, 37(1), 43(1), 43(3)
Sec. 32(1), Sec. 35C, Section 32, Section 32A, Section 35
Calcutta H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in allowing investment allowance on jeeps and motor-cycles owned by the assessee under s. 32A of the IT Act, 1961 ?
High Court Of Calcutta CIT vs. General Fibre Dealers (P) Ltd. Sections 32(1), 32A, 35C Y.R. Meena & Ranjan Kumar
