Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Section 277

Sec. 276C, Section 276, Section 277, Section 278B

Bombay H.C : the accused and its partners had concealed and evaded income to the tune of Rs. 2,34,265 and thereby committed an offence punishable under ss. 276C(1)(i) and 277(i) r/w s. 278B of the IT Act, during the year 1979-80

Avijit Das / February 15, 2007

High Court Of Bombay Union Of India vs. Commercial Fibres & Ors. Section 276C, 277, 278B Asst. Year 1979-80 J.H. […]

Sec. 276C, Section 277, Section 278

Patna H.C : The assessee/petitioners were seized and in pursuance thereof an assessment was made under the provisions of ss. 158BC and 158BD r/w s. 144 of the Act at a total income of Rs. 11,87,85,570 only and in the said assessment it has been established that the supplies of medicines and cattle feed,

Avijit Das / February 8, 2007

High Court Of Patna Medivet & Ors. vs. CIT & Anr Sections 276C, 277, 278 M. Saran, J. CR. Misc.

Sec. 276C, Section 276, Section 277

Delhi H.C : When penalty levied under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, for concealment of income has been cancelled by the appellate authority whether a prosecution can be continued under s. 276C of the Act ?

Avijit Das / January 2, 2007

High Court Of Delhi ITO vs. Rajan & Co. & Ors. Sections 276C, 277 Asst. Year 1990-91 Badar Durrez Ahmed,

Section 276C, Section 277, Section 278

Karnataka H.C : The IT authorities issued notice to A1 to A3 for submitting false return. A1 to A3 filed revised returns under s. 139(5)

Avijit Das / June 1, 2006

High Court Of Karnataka K.E. Sunil Babu, Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Steel Processors & Ors. Sections 276C, 277,

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 276C, Section 276, Section 277, Section 278, Section 278B, Section 279

Bombay H.C : the excise duty was not credited to its P&L a/c and this was done to avoid income-tax

Avijit Das / March 14, 2006

High Court Of Bombay Indian Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd. & Ors. vs. P.S. Dave & Anr. Section 276C, 277, 278B,

Sec. 276C, Section 277, Section 278, Section 278B

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The income of the firm which has wrongly been shown as goodwill for the purpose of tax evasion

Avijit Das / January 10, 2006

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Kusumchand Sharadchand & Anr. vs. Union Of India & Anr. Sections 276C,

Sec. 276C, Section 277

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The penalty proceedings for concealment of income were initiated under s. 271(1)(c)

Avijit Das / November 18, 2005

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Radheshyam Renwal vs. Union Of India & Ors. Sections 276C, 277 Asst.

Sec. 276C, Section 277

Punjab & Haryana H.C : This is a criminal appeal filed by the IT Department against the judgment of the Court of Sessions Judge, Sirsa, whereby the appeal filed by Shiv Kumar, the respondent, against the judgment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sirsa, dt. 12th Aug., 1988, convicting him for offence under ss. 276C and 277

Avijit Das / April 6, 2005

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana ITO vs. Shiv Kumar Section 276C & 277 Asst. Year 1979-80 M.M. Aggarwal, J.

Sec. 276C, Section 277

Kerala H.C : They were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and a fine of Rs. 7,500 and in default rigorous imprisonment for one month each for each of the offences under ss. 276C(1)(ii) and 277(ii) of IT Act

Avijit Das / February 22, 2005

High Court Of Kerala Edayanal Constructions & Anr. vs. ITO Sections 276C, 277 Asst. Year 1984-85 M. Sasidharan Nambiar, J.

Section 276C, Section 277

Jharkhand H.C : Whereby and whereunder, he refused to discharge the accused persons under s. 245 of the CrPC for the offence punishable under ss. 276C and 277 of the IT Act, 196

Avijit Das / January 25, 2005

High Court Of Jharkhand Tata Robins Fraser Ltd. vs. State Of Jharkhand & Ors. Section 276C, 277 Asst. Year 1983-84

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 … 10 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top