Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 271(1)(a)

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 273, Section 273B

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The petitioner, who is an assessee under the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ” the Act”), made an application in respect of the years 1968-69 and 1969-70 for waiver of penalty leviable under s. 271(1)(a), interest charged under ss. 139(8) and 217 and penalty leviable under s. 273 (b).

Avijit Das / July 4, 1987

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Jugalkishore Chandak vs. CIT Sections 273A, 139(8), 271(1)(a), 273(b) Asst. Year 1968-69, 1969-70 N.D. Ojha, […]

Sec. 2(47), Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271, Section 45

Bombay H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the present case falls within the four corners of s. 2(47) of the IT Act, 1961, and capital gain is exigible against the assessee for the asst. yr. 1964-65 ?

Avijit Das / March 23, 1987

High Court Of Bombay CIT vs. Jehangir Sections 2(47), 45, 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1964-65 B. JeejeebhoyBharucha & Sugla, JJ. IT

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order of the Tribunal upholding the penalty order under s. 271(1)(a) of the Act was justified ?

Avijit Das / January 4, 1983

High Court Of Allahabad Budhar Singh & Sons vs. CIT Section 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1967-68 R.M. Sahai & V.K. Mehrotra,

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271, Section 273, Section 273A

Allahabad H.C : On 19th August, 1972, petitioner, Jagannath Prasad Srivastava, made an application seeking to disclose his income for the asst. yrs. 1965-66 to 1972-73, and subsequently filed the requisite returns on 15th December, 1972.

Avijit Das / July 14, 1982

High Court Of Allahabad Jagannath Prasad Srivastava vs. CIT Sections 273A, 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1965-66, 1966-67, 1967-68 H.N. Seth &

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271, Uncategorized

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the penalty imposed under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, cannot be sustained ?

Avijit Das / July 1, 1982

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Gordhanbhai Jethabhai Section 271(1)(a) Asst. year 1968-69 A.M. Ahmadi & R.C. Mankad, JJ. IT

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Gauhati H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee being a registered firm was liable to pay penalty under s. 27l(1)(a) r/w s. 271(2) even though the assessed tax within the meaning of Expln. to s. 271 was a negative figure ?

Avijit Das / June 1, 1982

High Court Of Gauhati CIT vs. Ganesh Das Sreeram Section 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1966-67, 1969-70 B.L. Hansaria & T.C. Das,

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee could not be penalised for the default under s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, beyond the period of 25 months which commenced on 1st July, 1967, and ended on 31st Dec., 1968 ?

Avijit Das / November 13, 1981

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Madho Singh Ishar Dass Section 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1966-67 S. Ranganathan & Leila Seth,

Sec. 139(4), Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 139, Section 271

Bombay H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee had failed to furnish the return of his total income within the time allowed, by sub-s. (1) of s. 139 of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / September 28, 1981

High Court Of Bombay CIT vs. Abdul Hamid Shah Mohamed Sections 271(1)(a), 139(4) S.K. Desai & D.M. Rege, JJ. IT

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 139, Section 148, Section 271

Bombay H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the penalty leviable on the assessee for the asst. yr. 1962-63 under cl. (i) of s. 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, was properly levied and that the same should be on the net amount of tax payable by the assessee after deducting from the gross advance tax as well as provisional assessment tax, if any, paid by the assessee in relation to the said assessment year ?

Avijit Das / September 17, 1981

High Court Of Bombay Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Lalit Brothers Sections 139(2), 148, 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1962-63 S.K.

Sec. 271(1)(a), Section 271

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in reducing the penalty ?

Avijit Das / September 15, 1981

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Ramanlal Kamdar Section 271(1)(a) Asst. Year 1961-62 Balasubrahmanyan & Ratnam, JJ. T.C. No. 339

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 4 5 6 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top