Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Sec. 254(2)

Sec. 254(2), Sec. 260A, Section 254

Delhi H.C : the composite arrangement is in essence an arrangement for taking the premises on rent

Avijit Das / October 11, 2006

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. Sections 254(2), 260A Vikramajit Sen & Dr. S. […]

Sec. 254(2), Sec. 37(1), Section 254

Allahabad H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in recalling the proceedings to consider the applicability of s. 40A(9) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / October 3, 2006

High Court Of Allahabad Elgin Mills Co. Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 37(1), 254(2) Asst. Year 1980-81 R.K. Agrawal & Vikram

Sec. 254(2), Section 254, Section 80-I, Section 80B, Section 80HH

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in ignoring the relevant provisions of gross total income as given in s. 80B of the Act while deciding that the assessee was entitled to deduction under ss. 80HH and 80-I before adjustment of losses, sustained during the course of carrying out its business of an industrial undertaking ?

Avijit Das / September 26, 2006

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Kedia Leather And Liquor Ltd. Section 80B(5), 80HH, 80-I, 254(2)

Sec. 254(2), Section 254

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether Tribunal was justified in allowing the application made under s. 254 of the IT Act made by the assessee ?

Avijit Das / July 20, 2006

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Malwa Texturising (P) Ltd. Section 254(2) Asst. Year Block period

Sec. 254(2), Section 254

Kerala H.C : a rectification application under s. 254(2) of the IT Act, 1961, should be signed by the AO, this writ petition is filed

Avijit Das / July 4, 2006

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Section 254(2), ITAT Rule 34A K. Balakrishnan Nair, J. OP

Sec. 254(2), Section 254

Delhi H.C : the transactions evidenced by the said documents related to undisclosed income of the assessee, a notice under s. 158BC

Avijit Das / June 2, 2006

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors. Section 254(2) T.S. Thakur & Shiv Narayan Dhingra,

Sec. 254(2), Section 256, Section 69

Gujarat H.C : Whether, the Tribunal is right in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 7,65,960 on account of fictitious purchases of colour and chemicals ?

Avijit Das / January 25, 2006

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Kashiram Textile Mills (P) Ltd. Sections 69, 254(2), 256(2) Asst. Year 1977-78 D.A. Mehta

Sec. 254(2), Section 254, Section 69

Gujarat H.C : Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 8,24,762 made by the AO in respect of excess stock of fabric found during search by Preventive Wing of the Central Excise Department ?

Avijit Das / September 13, 2005

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. C. Lajpatrai Ltd. Section 69, 254(1) Asst. Year 1992-93 D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N.

Sec. 254(2), Section 254

Delhi H.C : The Tribunal had, it appears, disposed of the appeal on merits ex parte in the absence of the assessee vide order dt. 27th Feb., 2003. An application was thereafter filed seeking recall of the said order in what was described as a miscellaneous application under s. 254(2) of the IT Act

Avijit Das / August 16, 2005

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. SIEL Ltd. Section 254(2), ITAT Rule 24, Proviso T.S. Thakur & Badar Durrez Ahmed,

Sec. 254(2), Section 254

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the circular also goes to show that the AO or the Tribunal, as the case may be, assuming that it was applicable to applications filed under s. 254(2)

Avijit Das / July 4, 2005

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Raja Malwinder Singh vs. Union Of India & Anr. Section 254(2) Asst. Years 1972-73,

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 … 7 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top