Section 220 – taxcaselaw.com

Madras H.C : An application for stay of recovery of demand under Section 220(6)

High Court Of Madras Mrs. Kannammal vs. ITO Section 220(6) Asst. Year 2016-17 Dr. Anita Sumanth, J. W.P.No.3849 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.4278 of 2019 13th February, 2019 Counsel Appeared: S.Sathiyanarayanan for the Petitioner.: Jayapratap for the Respondent. ORDER Mr. Jayapratap, learned counsel for the respondent takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of both …

Madras H.C : The Assessing Officer under the provisions of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), directing the petitioner to pay 20% of the tax demanded from the petitioner for the assessment year 2015-16

High Court Of Madras Samms Juke Box vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Section 143(3) , 157, 220(6) Asst. Year 2015-16 T. S. Sivagnanam, J. Writ Petition No. 3735 of 2018 and W.M.P. No. 4550 of 2018 28th June, 2018 Counsel Appeared: M. V. Swaroop for the Petitioner.: Rajkumar Jhabkh, J. Narayanaswamy for the Respondent ORDER …

Kerala H.C : The petitioner that he was residing in Abu Dhabi for more than 20 years and that he was undergoing medical treatments in Abu Dhabi under a health insurance cover

High Court Of Kerala Mailakkattu Varghese Uthup vs. Pr. CIT Section 220, 179, 230 P. B. Suresh Kumar, J. W.P.(C).No. 10675 of 2018-H 11th June, 2018 Counsel appeared: Preetha S.Nair Adv. for the Petitioner JUDGMENT Exts.P8 and P13 orders issued under Sections 230 and 179, respectively of the Income Tax Act (â€œthe Actâ€), are under challenge …

Bombay H.C : Where appeal of assessee was awaiting disposal by Commissioner (Appeals) and assessee had deposited 38 per cent of outstanding demand, ad-interim stay was to be granted and revenue was to be restrained from taking any coercive steps to recover outstanding demands from assessee

High Court Of Bombay Vodafone India Ltd. vs. CIT, TDS Section 220 Assessment years 2000-01 to 2012-13 M.S. Sanklecha And Riyaz I. Chagla, JJ. Writ Petition (L) No. 18 Of 2018 January Â 4, 2018 ORDER 1.Not on board. Mentioned at 11.00 a.m. for urgent reliefs as the Respondent – Revenue has threatened to attach its bank …

Delhi H.C : No appeal lies against the said order under Section 246A (1)(c)

High Court Of Delhi Televista Electronics Ltd. vs. DCIT Section 246, 154, 220 Assessment year 1989-90 Sanjiv Khanna & Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, JJ. IT Appeal No. 457 Of 2005 November 16, 2017 ORDER Sanjiv Khanna, J. – This appeal by the assessee-M/s Televista Electronics Limited relates to assessment year 1989-90 and arises from the order …

Delhi H.C : Section 226(3)(iii) only requires that a copy of notice issued under section 226(3)(i) to bank of assessee should be forwarded to assessee and not that a copy of notice should be served on assessee in advance or simultaneously

High Court Of Delhi Gecas Services India (P.) Ltd. vs. ITO Section 226, 156, 220 Dr. S. Muralidhar And Prathiba M. Singh , JJ. W.P.(C) No. 3127 Of 2017 July Â 11, 2017 ORDER Question Insolved Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.Â – An interesting question of law that has been raised in this writ petition by GECAS Services India …

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The applications for stay of demand under Section 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act has been disposed of by the learned Additional Commissioner, Range-3, Indore

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh (Indore Bench) Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. ACIT & Anr. S.C.Sharma & Rajeev Kumar Dubey, JJ. Section 220 (6) Asst. Year 2011-12, 2012-13 WP-7779-2016 12th January, 2017 Counsel appeared: Sarvesh Shrivastava for the Petitioner. ORDER: Partlies through their counsel. Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy …

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Where on merit assessee, a state Government charitable institute, was likely to win the case and further it had refund due and pre-deposit in other cases quantifying more than amount required to be pre-deposited in instant appeal, stay on pre-deposit to be granted

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana Punjab Institute of Medical Sciences vs. DCIT (Exemptions) Section : 220, 12AA and 250 Assessment Year : 2013-14 S.J. Vazifdar, CJ. And Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. CWP No. 25675 Of 2016 3 May 2017 JUDGMENT Anupinder Singh Grewal, J.Â – The petitioner has impugned order dated 25.11.2016 (Annexure P-1) whereby …

Delhi H.C : Three Petitioners filed applications for waiver of interest under Section 220 (2A) of the IT Act for the various AYs

High Court Of Delhi Preeti N. Aggarwala vs. CCIT Section : 244A, 220(2A) Assessment years 1993-1997, 1998-99, 2002-2007 – Dr. S. Muralidhar And Chander Shekhar, JJ. W.P. (C.) Nos. 1011, 1012 & 1183 Of 2016 May 1, 2017 ORDER Dr. S. Muralidhar, J. – The central question involved in these three writ petitions under Article 226 …

S.C : The CIT (Appeals) vide order dated 28.10.2016 rejected the stay applications and directed the appellant to deposit 15 per cent of the total tax demand for assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2012-13 in four instalments.

Supreme Court Of India Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation vs. CIT (Exemptions) Section 220 R.K. Agrawal And Abhay Manohar Sapre, JJ. Civil Appeal Nos. 4557-4558 Of 2017 March 24, 2017 ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. Mrs . Anil Katiyar appears on behalf of the respondents and waives service of notice. 3. These appeals have been filed by …

Category: Section 220