Madras H.C : the activity of the petitioner constituted manufacture within the meaning of s. 80-IB
High Court Of Madras Vinbros & Co. vs. ITO & Anr. Sections 156, 220(1), proviso Asst. Years 2001-02, 2003-04, 2004-05 […]
Section 156, Section 220
Section 156
Sec. 194-I, Section 156
Karnataka H.C : There is a clear departure in the case of s. 205 by not mentioning the words ‘remittance of the amount’ in this section
High Court Of Karnataka Smt. Anusuya Alva vs. DCIT & Ors. Sections 156, 194-I, 205 D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J. Writ
Section 148, Section 156, Section 221
Delhi H.C : The present petition is directed, inter alia, against the notice of demand under s. 156 of the IT Act, 1961
High Court Of Delhi Braham Prakash vs. Income Tax Officer Section 148, 156, 221 B.C. Patel, C.J. & Badar Durrez
Section 156, Section 220, Section 226
Calcutta H.C : The petitioner is an assessee under the Act. The petitioner received a notice dt. 15th Feb., 2000, under s. 158BC of the Act from the office of the Jt. CIT, Special Range-8, directing the petitioner to submit a return for the block period, viz., 1989—2nd December, 1999.
High Court Of Calcutta Golam Momen vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. Sections 156, 220(6), 226(3) Bhaskar Bhattacharya,
Sec. 234A, Sec. 234B, Sec. 234C, Sec. 234D, Section 156
Patna H.C : The petitioner—Nalanda X’Ray & Scan Research Centre of CWJC No. 12106/2002 is a partnership firm and Dr. S.N. Prasad (Petitioner of CWJC No. 12842/2002) and his wife Dr. (Mrs.) Santosh Prasad (Petitioner of CWJC No. 12105/2002) are partners of the said firm.
High Court Of Patna Dr. (Mrs.) Santosh Prasad vs. CIT Sections 156, 234A, 234B, 234C, 245D Asst. Year 1987-88, 1989-90,
Section 156, Section 222, Section 225
S.C : Whether the TRO could have confirmed the sale on 25th March, 1998, when the demands on account of tax for the recovery of which tax recovery certificates were issued had admittedly ceased to exist;
Supreme Court Of India Mohan Wahi vs. CIT & Ors. Sections 156, 222, 225(3), SCH. II, Rules 56 & 63
Sec. 2(43), Section 156, Section 161, Section 220
Allahabad H.C : The petitioner further seeks a writ, order or direction prohibiting the respondent No. 2 from proceeding with the recovery of the demand mentioned in the notice dt. 22nd July, 1987.
High Court Of Allahabad Jogender Singh vs. Income Tax Officer Sections 2(43), 156, 161, 220 Asst. Year 1975-76 M.C. Agarwal
Section 143, Section 154, Section 156
Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the calculation of tax payable by the assessee having been done as per ITNS-150 forms in March, 1982, the rectification under s. 154 of the IT Act, 1961, was barred by limitation ?
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CIT vs. Miss Swarn Taneja Sections 143, 154, 156 Asst. Year1976-77, 1977-78 S.K. Jha, C.J.
