Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

rejection of settlement application

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 245D

Madras H.C : The Settlement Application filed by the petitioner was not allowed to be proceeded with and treated as invalid under Section 245D(2C)

Avijit Das / August 24, 2018

High Court Of Madras Abdul Rahim vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245D(2C) Asst. Year 2010-11 to 2016-17 K. Ravichandrabaabu, […]

Section 279, Section 276B

Delhi H.C : The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 279(2) rejecting its application whereby relief of compounding of the offence under Section 276B

Avijit Das / January 3, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Sports Infratech (P.) Ltd. vs. DCIT (Hqrs) Section 279, 276B S. Ravindra Bhat And Najmi Waziri,

Section 220, Section 222

Karnataka H.C : No reasons are recorded for rejecting the application filed under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Ac

Avijit Das / November 23, 2016

High Court Of Karnataka Mookambika Associates vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle 2 (1), Bengaluru Section 220, 222 Jayant

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr.CIT) dated 14.06.2016 rejecting its application to stay the recovery of the demand of about Rs. 277 crores till the disposal of its appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals

Avijit Das / September 21, 2016

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. vs. Pr. CIT Section 220 S.J. Vazifdar, CJ. And

Sec. 245R, Section 143

Delhi H.C : The assessee/petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of its application under Section 245R(2)

Avijit Das / August 29, 2016

High Court Of Delhi Sage Publications Ltd. U.K. vs. DCIT (IT) Circle-II (2), New Delhi Section 245R, 143 Assessment Year

Madras H.C : the petitioners filed another application on 10.07.2015 for the same assessment years requesting the Commission to take up the matter and consider the same and this application was rejected by order dated 15.07.2015 and the Commission has stated that the petitioners have re-submitted their applications along with circulars issued by the CBDT

Avijit Das / June 21, 2016

High Court Of Madras Arun Mammen vs. Union Of India Section 245BA T.S. Sivagnanam, J. W.P. Nos. 22216 To 22219

Delhi H.C : Whether scope of review under Article 226 insofar as an order passed by Settlement Commission under section 245D is limited one, therefore, interference can only be made if there is a fault in decision making process, and not with decision itself

Avijit Das / May 16, 2014

High Court Of Delhi CIT (C)- III vs. Gopal Gupta Assessment Years : 2003-04 To 2009-10 Section : 245D Badar

Sec. 245HA, Sec. 245D, Section 153

Bombay H.C : Application for settlement was rightly rejected, where on date of filing application before Settlement Commission there were no assessment proceedings pending with Assessing Officer as same had expired by efflux of time

Avijit Das / January 17, 2014

High Court Of Bombay Shriniwas Machine Craft (P.) Ltd. VS. ITSC Assessment Years : 2007-08 To 2009-10 Section : 245HA,

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top