Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Punjab And Haryana High Court

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the amount on account of cash incentive and duty drawback though claimed but not received actually by the assessee would be taxable under the IT Act ?

Avijit Das / April 19, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd. Section 256(2) Asst. Year 1984-85 Adarsh Kumar Goel […]

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 260A, Section 260, Section 68

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence placed on record, the finding that Sh. Surinder Kumar had no identifiable source of income out of which he could advance the loan of Rs. 50,000 is sustainable in law ?

Avijit Das / April 17, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Sethi Cotton Traders vs. ITO Sections 68, 260A Asst. Years 1989-90, 1991-92 Adarsh Kumar

Section 256, Section 68

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal is right in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,60,000 made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A) on account of unexplained credits in the capital accounts of partners ?

Avijit Das / February 28, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Kulwant Singh & Co. Section 68, 256(2) Asst. Year 1989-90 D.k. Jain,

Sec. 158BB, Sec. 260A, Section 158

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the addition of Rs. 50,000 on the true interpretation of the provisions of Chapter XIV-B for making an assessment of undisclosed income for the block period without being based on any evidence or material found during the course of the search relatable to this addition of Rs. 50,000.

Avijit Das / January 19, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Hotel Kumar Palace vs. CIT Sections 158BB, 260A Block period 1st April, 1989 to

Sec. 143(3), Sec. 254(1), Sec. 260A, Section 143, Section 254, Section 260

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in law to admit additional evidence and granting relief to the assessee on the basis of this evidence in violation of r. 29 of the IT (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 ?

Avijit Das / January 16, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Bank Of Punjab Ltd. Sections 143(3), 254(1), 260A, ITAT Rule 29 Asst.

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, the learned Tribunal was right in law in dismissing the appeal of the Revenue by holding that the payment was made by Shri Kulwant Singh, although the facts as found for the CIT (A) in order dt. 8th Oct., 1992, for the asst. yr. 1989-90 were different ?

Avijit Das / January 9, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Kulwant Singh & Co. Section 4 Asst. Year 1988-89 D.K. Jain, C.J.

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in vacating the finding of the CIT(A), Ludhiana, that the return filed by the assessee on 14th Dec., 1977 was not valid and no regular assessment could be made on the basis of the same ?

Avijit Das / January 3, 2006

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Amritsar Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Sections 139(2), 146, 256 Asst. Year 1974-75

Punjab & Haryana H.C : That whether, under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal’s finding that in case of surveys the method of assessment shall be estimation of profit as per past history and addition over and above the amount surrendered is justifiable and correct in law ?

Avijit Das / December 12, 2005

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Surinder Kumar Charanjit Kumar vs. CIT Sections 145(1), proviso, 260A Asst. Year 1997-98 D.K.

Sec. 260A, Section 260, Section 32

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether the Hon’ble Tribunal was right in law in separately allowing depreciation to the assessee for the asst. yr. 1994-95 when the net profit rate at 8 per cent was adopted thereby deeming that the deductions under ss. 30 to 38 have already been given full effect ?

Avijit Das / December 6, 2005

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Bhullar Builders (P) Ltd. Sections 32, 260A Asst. Year 1994-95 D.K. Jain,

Sec. 35(1)(iv), Sec. 35(3), Section 35

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was right in law in allowing expenditure not incurred in the previous year in view of s. 35(2)(ia) of the Act ?

Avijit Das / August 29, 2005

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. F.C.S. International Marketing (P) Ltd. Sections 35(1)(iv), 35(2), 35(3) Asst. Year 1985-86

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 52 53 54 … 96 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top