penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Archives - Page 3 of 9

Bombay H.C : Assessee raised a claim which was eventually disallowed did not mean that ingredients of clause (c) were satisfied so as to justify imposition of penalty, no substantial question of law arose from said finding of Tribunal

Avijit Das / July 10, 2014

High Court Of Bombay CIT-2 Vs. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Section 271(1)(C) S.C. Dharmadhikari And B.P. Colabawalla, JJ. IT Appeal […]

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh CIT, Visakhapatnam vs. Sri Kamakshi Food Products (P.) Ltd. Section : 271(1)(c), 41(1) Assessment year

High Court Of Delhi CIT Vs. Global Associates Section 271(1)(C) S. Ravindra Bhat And Vibhu Bakhru, JJ. IT Appeal No.

High Court Of Gujarat CIT Vs. Dharamshi B. Shah Section 271(1)(C) Assessment Year 1995-96 M.R. Shah And K.J. Thaker, JJ.

High Court Of Bombay Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd. VS. DCIT Assessment Year : 2004-05 Section : 271(1)(c) S.C. Dharmadhikari And

Avijit Das / April 7, 2014

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Jindal Polyester & Steel Ltd. Assessment Year 1998-99 Section 271(1)(C), 115J And 115JB Rajes

Avijit Das / March 21, 2014

High Court Of Calcutta Gourav Goenka vs. ACIT Assessment Year : 2007-08 Section : 271(1)(c) Girish Chandra Gupta And Tapash

Avijit Das / March 5, 2014

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. Assessment Year : 1996-97 Section : 271(1)(c), 43(1)

Avijit Das / March 4, 2014

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh Kuldeep Wines vs. CIT (Appeals) Assessment Year : 1982-83 Section : 271(1)(c) G. Chandraiah And

Avijit Das / January 29, 2014

High Court Of Kerala Medical Land vs. CIT (Appeals), Kochi Assessment Year : 1995-96 Section : 158B, 132, 32, 158BB,