Madras High Court on GST

GST Caselaws, Section 20, Section 59

Madras H.C : Where assessee, against order of assessment, filed writ petition contending that AO had failed to consider that payment had been made to subcontractor and as per rule 8(5) of VAT Rules same had to be adjusted, which AO had failed to consider, petition was dismissed on ground of alternative remedy available to assessee under statute

/

High Court Of Madras Coastal Oil and Gas Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT) Section 59, 20,84 Assessment years

GST Caselaws, Section 6, Section 9

Madras H.C : In view of several representations by State government road contractors’ association against 12 per cent GST instead of 2 per cent VAT and also in view of Government’s interim directions in respect of collection of tax pending notification of new guidelines, Commissioner was directed to consider said representation and pass order within four weeks

/

High Court Of Madras Coimbatore Corp. Contractors Welfare Association vs. State of Tamil Nadu Section : 9, 6 T.S. Sivagnanam,

Section 73, GST Caselaws, Section 84

Madras H.C : Where HC clarified that product of assessee viz. decorative laminate sheets would fall under Chapter Heading 4823.90 and thereafter AA on basis of a subsequent decision of SC reopened assessment of assessee and held that assessee’s product would fall under Chapter Heading 3920.21, AA had no power to reopen assessment

/

High Court Of Madras Rajshree Laminates Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Trichy Sections : 73 to 84 T.S.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security