In favour of Matter remanded

Section 40A, Sec. 40A(3)

S.C : Whether any amount of sugarcane purchase price paid by the assessee-society to its members/non-members above the SMP determined under Clause 3 of the Control Order, 1966, may be paid as per the price determined by the State Government under Clause 5A of the Control Order, 1966, can be said to be the sharing of profit and therefore is to be included in the return of income?

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd. Section 40A(3) Asst. Year 1998-99 A. K. Sikri, S. Abdul

Section 142, Sec. 142(1), Section 144

Madras H.C : Whether the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in remitting the case to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) with a direction to consider the additional ground raised by the assessee with regard to non issue of notice under Section 143(2) by the Assessing Officer before completion of assessment without considering the circumstantial evidence, under which, the Assessing Offi er ould not issue notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act ?

High Court Of Madras Pr. CIT Central vs. J Jay Tv Pvt. Ltd. Section 142(1), 144 Asst. Year 1995-96 T.S.

Sec. 143(3)

Allahabad H.C : Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT has erred in law and fact by not setting aside the issue of addition of Rs. 3,38,72,852/-on non-genuine purchases to the file of the CIT(A) while the learned ITAT quashed the direction of CIT(A) on the same especially in view of the fact that the ITAT is the ultimate fact finding authority, it should have either settled the issue on the basis of material on record or set aside the matter to the CIT(A) for deciding within the powers vested in it?

High Court Of Allahabad Pr.CIT vs. Meerut Roller Flour Mills (P) Ltd. Section 143(3) Asst. Year 2009-10 Bharati Sapru &

GST Caselaws, Section 107

Gujarat H.C : Where AA had imposed penalty upon assessee and AC had dismissed appeal of assessee on ground that it had not deposited amount of pre deposit and Tribunal having found that assessee had deposited pre deposit amount decided penalty issue on merits, Tribunal had no jurisdiction to decide penalty issue on merits by itself

High Court Of Gujarat State of Gujarat Vs. Hitarth Corporation Section 107 Akil Kureshi And B.N. Karia, Jj. Tax Appeal

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security