Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

In favour of Assessee

Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The learned ITAT was right in law in upholding the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in deleting the addition of Rs. 50,18,599 made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus purchases even though the assessee had failed to prove the genuineness of these purchases

Avijit Das / September 15, 2010

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. P. R. Packaging Ltd. Assessment Year : 2005-06 Section : 37(1) Adarsh […]

Delhi H.C : Whether the learned ITAT erred in law and on merits by setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263

Avijit Das / September 14, 2010

High Court Of Delhi CIT, Delhi – II vs. Leisure Wear Exports Ltd. Assessment Year : 2001-02 Section : 263

Sec. 17(3), Section 17

Delhi H.C : Whether amount of Rs. 35 lakhs received by the assessee was chargeable to tax under section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, as ‘profit in lieu of salary

Avijit Das / September 14, 2010

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Deepak Verma Assessment Year 2001-02 Section : 17 (3) A.K. Sikri And Ms. Reva

Delhi H.C : merely because in Notes on Clauses it has been mentioned that it is clarificatory in nature, it cannot be said that the substituted section is clarificatory in nature

Avijit Das / September 14, 2010

High Court Of Delhi CIT Vs. Karan Bihari Thapar Assessment Year : 1998-99 & 1999-2000 Section : 6 Manmohan, J.

Delhi H.C : Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in cancelling the order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax

Avijit Das / September 13, 2010

High Court Of Delhi CIT, Delhi-IV Vs. International Travel House Ltd. Assessment Year : 2003-04 Section : 263 Dipak Misra,

Sec. 271(1)(c )

Delhi H.C : Whether the Tribunal was correct in law and on facts in deleting the penalty of Rs. 20,22,944, imposed by the AO under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act ?

Avijit Das / September 13, 2010

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Dharampal Premchand Ltd. Section 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 2001-02 Dipak Misra, C.J., & Manmohan, J.

Sec. 271(1)(c ), Section 263, Section 271

Punjab & Haryana H.C : No Revision u/s 263 possible if ITO failed to record his opinion about the leviability of penalty in the case.

Avijit Das / September 10, 2010

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana CIT-I, Ludhiana Vs. Subhash Kumar Jain Assessment Year : 1994-95 Section : 271(1)(C), 263

Sec. 2(14), Section 2

Bombay H.C : Whether capital gain arising out of the sale of agricultural land was not chargeable to tax

Avijit Das / September 9, 2010

High Court Of Bombay CIT, Panaji-Goa Vs. Smt. Debbie Alemao Section : 2(14) D.G. Karnik And F.M. Reis, JJ. Tax

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The provisions of section 80-I(8) and (9) are not applicable in this case and that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was not justified in restoring this issue back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration

Avijit Das / September 9, 2010

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Punjab Wool Combers Ltd. Assessment Year : 1990-91 Section : 80-I Adarsh

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 16A, Section 10, Section 11, Section 15, Section 16, Section 5, Section 6, Section 7, Section 9

S.C : In the case of Stock Exchange, Ahmedabad (supra), the question which arose for determination was whether after the demise of a stock-broker could he be declared a defaulter by the Exchange ?

Avijit Das / September 9, 2010

Supreme Court Of India Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. & ORS. vs. CIT Section 32(1)(ii), BSE Bye-laws, 400 Bombay Stock

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 233 234 235 … 724 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top