furnishing document with reasons to believe

Delhi H.C : the sole basis for the reassessment notice, i.e. the statement made by Mr. Sanjay Rastogi that he and his associates provided bogus entries to various entities, could not have been the basis for valid reassessment notice

Avijit Das / March 9, 2017

High Court Of Delhi Amsa India (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT, Delhi Section 68, 147 Assessment years 1997-98 to 2001-02 S. […]

Avijit Das / December 1, 2016

High Court Of Delhi Aravali Infrapower Ltd. vs. DCIT Section 68, 147 And 148 Assessment Year 2008-09 S. Ravindra Bhat

Avijit Das / February 28, 2014

High Court Of Delhi Acorus Unitech Wireless (P.) Ltd. VS. ACIT Assessment Year : 2009-10 Section : 148, 147 S.

Avijit Das / March 20, 2012

High Court Of Delhi D.T.T.D.C. vs. DCIT Section 147, 148, 142, 143(2) Asst. Year 2000-01 Sanjiv Khanna & R.V. Easwar,

Avijit Das / December 8, 2009

High Court Of Karnataka Krishna Fabrications Ltd. Vs. JCIT (Asst.), Special Range-1, Bangalore Assessment Year : 1997-98 Section : 37(1)

Scroll to Top