Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

Delhi High Court

Delhi H.C : no adverse material was found during the course of search to suggest that the assessee had understated the investment in the properties

Avijit Das / July 18, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Ashok Khetrapal Section 158BB Block period 1999-2000 to 17th Nov., 2000 Madan B. Lokur […]

Delhi H.C : the AO should not have come to the conclusion that the gifts were bogus

Avijit Das / July 13, 2007

High Court Of Delhi Rajeev Tandon vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Section 68 Asst. Year 2001-02 Madan B. Lokur

Sec. 158BB, Sec. 260A

Delhi H.C : A search and seizure operation was conducted in respect of the premises of the assessee and some material was allegedly seized on the basis of which the AO came to the conclusion that the assessee had certain undisclosed income

Avijit Das / July 13, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Sunita Aggarwal Section 158BB, 260A Block period 1st April, 1986 to 31st March, 1997

Section 147, Section 148

Delhi H.C : the notice issued by the AO under s. 148 of the IT Act, 1961, was bad in law and, therefore, the assessment framed in pursuance thereof was liable to be quashed

Avijit Das / May 29, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Vipin Batra Section 147, 148 Asst. Year 1996-97 Madan B. Lokur & V. B.

Section 147, Section 148

Delhi H.C : The assessees had invested their money received from undisclosed sources and taken back the amounts through a negotiable instrument

Avijit Das / May 23, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Atul Jain Section 147, 148 Asst. Year 1997-98 Madan B. Lokur & V.B. Gupta.

Sec. 260A, Sec. 37(1)

Delhi H.C : The assessee carries on the business of manufacturing and production of CTD bars as also different types of iron rods

Avijit Das / May 23, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Usha Iron & Ferro Metal Corpn. Ltd. Section 37(1), 260A Asst. Year 1995-96 to

Sec. 158B, Section 158

Delhi H.C : the Revenue filed an appeal before the Tribunal and vide the impugned order the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the Revenue that as per provisions of s. 132 (4A)

Avijit Das / May 22, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Girish Chaudhary Section 158B(B) Block period : A.Y. 1990-91 to 18th Jan., 2000 Madan

Section 147, Section 148

Delhi H.C : Waiver of Funded Interest Loan credited to P&L a/c in the books not taxable as the same is a capital receipt.

Avijit Das / May 22, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Eicher Ltd. Section 147, 148 Asst. Year 1993-94 Madan B. Lokur & V.B. Gupta,

Delhi H.C : Why a bad and doubtful debt claimed by the assessee cannot be treated as an ascertained liability

Avijit Das / May 18, 2007

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. HCL Comnet Systems & Services Section 115JA Asst. Year 1997-98 Madan B. Lokur &

Section 27, Wealth Tax Act

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in upholding the order of the CIT of Wealth Tax (A), deleting the addition of Rs.93,50,584 representing the value of the assets claimed to be owned by ‘Kalinga Foundation Trust’, which was found by the WTO to be not genuine and only a benami concern of the assessee ?

Avijit Das / May 16, 2007

High Court Of Delhi Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Biju Patnaik Section WT 27(3) Madan B. Lokur & V.B. Gupta,

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 103 104 105 … 180 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top