Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

CESTAT- Chennai

GST Caselaws, Sec. 65(91)

CESTAT-Chennai : Where assessee provided cab to other travel agents for rendering services to foreign tourist, activity undertaken by assessee would not fall under category of ‘rent-a-cab scheme operator service’

Avijit Das / March 6, 2018

CESTAT, Chennai Bench Wheels Tourists Operator Vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Section 65(91) Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Judicial […]

CESTAT- Chennai : Product ‘textile fabric combined with PU foam’, wherein percentage of fabric in white type was about 200 per cent more compared to content of PU foam and percentage of fabric in black type was more than 200 per cent of content of PU foam, classifiable under Chapter Heading No. 5903

Avijit Das / February 21, 2018

CESTAT, Chennai Bench Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III Vs. Joy Foam (P.) Ltd. Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Judicial Member And

CESTAT-Chennai : Whether activity of pumping would fall within ambit of ‘transport of goods other than water through pipeline or through other conduit’ as alleged by Adjudicating Authority

Avijit Das / August 9, 2017

CESTAT, Chennai Bench Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai vs. RMC Readymix India (P.) Ltd. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Judicial Member And

GST Caselaws, Sec. 65(19)

CESTAT-Chennai : Where assessee, a sales agent for Saudi Arabian Airlines was entitled to receive fixed commission on passenger ticket sales and cargo sales, service was nothing but ‘export of business auxiliary services’ exempted from liability to service tax

Avijit Das / August 4, 2017

CESTAT, Chennai Bench Arafaath Travels (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai Section 65(19) Sulekha Beevi C.S., Judicial Member

GST Caselaws, Section 2

CESTAT-Chennai : Whether printed computer stationary/manifold business forms being manufactured by assessee being customized business forms which cannot be sold in open market are classifiable under chapter heading 4901.90 attracting NIL rate of duty

Avijit Das / July 28, 2017

CESTAT, Chennai Bench Mehra Computers System Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-IV Section 2 Ms. Sulekha Beevi, Judicial Member

GST Caselaws, Section 15, Section 4

CESTAT- Chennai : When design and drawings are intrinsically tied to emergence of final product and without which intended goods cannot be conceived or manufactured, intrinsic value of such design and drawing charges has to be added for purpose of determining assessable value of goods

Avijit Das / July 14, 2017

CESTAT Chennai Bench Larsen And Toubro Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-IV SectionÂ 15, 4 Sulekha Beevi Cs, Judicial

CESTAT-Chennai : Whether said product was classifiable under Heading No. 8409 as claimed by assessee and not under Heading No. 8511 as pleaded by revenu

Avijit Das / July 11, 2017

CESTAT, Chennai Bench Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry Vs. Reil Electricals (India) Ltd. Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Judicial Member And

GST Caselaws, Sec. 65(23)

CESTAT-Chennali : Where as per terms of agreement, essential character of activity carried out by assessee was only transportation of goods, mere fact that it also performed ancilliary activity of loading, unloading of good etc., same would not bring services rendered by it under category of ‘cargo handling service’

Avijit Das / July 7, 2017

CESTAT, Chennai Bench Diamond Shipping Agencies (P.) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli Section : 65(23) Ms. Sulekha Beevi

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top