Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

407 ITR

Calcutta H.C : the appellant did not file its return for the relevant assessment year within the period prescribed under Section 139 (1) of the Act.

Avijit Das / May 4, 2018

High Court Of Calcutta Suolificio Linea Italia (India) (P) Ltd. vs. JCIT Section 80-IB Sanjib Banerjee & Abhijit Gangopadhyay, JJ. […]

Section 54F, Sec. 2(47)

Gujarat H.C : the appellant would not be entitled to benefit of deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 since the construction of the flats for personal use was completed before the sale of the capital asset

Avijit Das / May 1, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Ushaben Jayantilal Sodhan vs. ITO Section 54F, 2(47) Asst. Year . 2009-10 Akil Kureshi & B.

Sec. 143(3), Section 147

Jammu & Kashmir H. C : The Hon’ble ITAT Amritsar was right in not following the Circular No. 5/2014 of CBDT, New Delhi dated 11.02.2014 wherein the intention of the legislature was clarified

Avijit Das / April 18, 2018

High Court Of Jammu & Kashmir Pr.CIT vs. Jammu Central Coop. Bank Ltd. Ramalingam Sudhakar, Acj Sanjeev Kumar, J. ITA

Gujarat H.C : Provisions of S.151(2) of the Income Tax Act are complied with when actual satisfaction was taken of Commissioner only

Avijit Das / March 19, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Mayurbhai Mangaldas Patel vs. ITO Akil Kureshi & B.N. Karia, JJ. R/Tax Appeal No. 29 of

Sec. 143(3), Section 127, Section 148

Gujarat H.C : the Assessing Officer in the present case did not travel beyond expressing his clear intention to withdraw the notice.

Avijit Das / March 7, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Marwadi Shares And Finance Limited vs. DCIT Section 143(3), 148, 127(2)(a) Asst. Year 2010-11 Akil Kureshi

Sec. 12A, Sec. 260A

Bombay H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in restoring the registration under section 12A

Avijit Das / February 28, 2018

High Court Of Bombay CIT (Exemption) vs. Sadguru Narendra Maharaj Sansthan Section 260-A, 12A M.S. Sanklecha & Sandeep K. Shinde,

Section 132, Sec. 153A, Section 153

Andhara Pradesh & Telangana H.C : The Appellant/Assessee has discharged his onus of proof regarding the gift by furnishing all the materials required for establishing the genuineness of the gift

Avijit Das / February 23, 2018

High Court Of Andhara Pradesh & Telangana Pendurthi Chandrasekhar vs. DCIT Section 132, 153-A Asst. Year 2006-2007 C. V. Nagarjuna

Section 80-IB, Sec. 143(3)

Gujarat H.C : The petitioner has challenged a notice of reopening dated 31.3.2017 issued by the respondent Assessing Officer.

Avijit Das / February 21, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Royal Infrastucture vs. DCIT Akil Kureshi & B. N. Karia, JJ. Section 80-IB(10), 143(3) Asst. Year

Sec. 143(1), Section 143

Gujarat H.C: The respondent-Assessing Officer seeking to reopen the petitioner’s assessment for the assessment year 2010-11

Avijit Das / February 6, 2018

High Court Of Gujarat Jalil Abdulbhai Shaikh vs. DCIT Akil Kureshi & B.N. Karia, JJ. Section 143(1) Asst. Year 2010-11

Sec. 12A, Sec. 206A

Bombay H.C : the registration granted under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to avail the benefit of exemption would continue even after the assessee society was found to be regularly involved in holding various commercial tournaments on behalf of BCCI and receiving payment from BCCI for TV and other rights, which also amounted to carrying on activity in the nature of rendering services to trade, commerce or business and thus hit by the mischief of the proviso to Section 2(15) introduced w.e.f. 01.04.2009

Avijit Das / January 22, 2018

High Court Of Bombay Pr.CIT vs. Maharashtra Cricket Association Section : 260A, 12A Asst. Year : 2009-10 M. S. Sanklecha

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 3 4 5 … 7 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top