Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

275 ITR

Andhra Pradesh H.C : Whether the Tribunal is correct in law in its finding that the amount of Rs. 7,85,725 provided by the assessee as an accrued liability is contingent liability and hence not an allowable deduction ?

Avijit Das / January 19, 2005

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh Kanakateegala Enterprises vs. CIT Section 37(1) Asst. Year 1988-89 M.H.S. Ansari & T. Ch. Surya […]

Section 245, Section 256

Allahabad H.C : Is the order of the Tribunal restoring the case for fresh disposal back to the CIT(A) legally valid ?

Avijit Das / January 6, 2005

High Court Of Allahabad New Cawnpore Flour Mills vs. CIT Section 254(1), 256 Asst. Year 1979-80 R.K. Agrawal & Prakash

Sec. 260A, Section 260

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal was justified in observing that since very basis of assessment order dt. 3rd Dec., 1987 no longer exists the appeal by the Revenue is of no substance ?

Avijit Das / January 3, 2005

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Steel Ingots Ltd. vs. DCIT Section 260A Asst. Year 1991-92 A.M. Sapre

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that ad hoc method of account is one of the recognised methods of valuing stocks under the principles of accountancy?

Avijit Das / January 3, 2005

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Sant Ram Mangat Ram Section 145 Asst. Year 1981-82 G.S. Singhvi &

Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts, circumstances and legal positions, the assessee is entitled to allowance of an amount of Rs. 2,49,508 on account of renovation of the theatre, stamp duty, interest payment, etc. as an admissible deduction as revenue expenditure ?

Avijit Das / December 15, 2004

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Laxmi Talkies Section 37(1) Asst. Year 1976-77 D.A. Mehta & Ms. H.N. Devani, JJ.

Sec. 158BB, Sec. 260A, Section 260

Madhya Pradesh H.C Whether this appeal involves any substantial question of law as is required to be made out under s. 260A

Avijit Das / December 9, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Dr. Ashok Jain Section 158BB, 260A A.M. Sapre & Ashok

Sec. 37(1), Sec. 40A(8), Section 32

Andhra Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in upholding the disallowance out of interest payable on the deposits accepted under the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 1975, by applying the provisions of s. 40A(8) of the IT Act,1961, for the asst. yrs. 1980-81 and 1981-82 ?

Avijit Das / December 8, 2004

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh I.D.L. Chemicals vs. CIT Sections 32, 37(1), 40A(8), Rule 5 Asst. Year 1980-81, 1981-82 Mrs.

Section 147, Section 148

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in affirming the order of the AAC annulling the reassessment proceedings ?

Avijit Das / December 3, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Suresh Kumar L/H Of Siri Ram Sections 147(A), 148 Asst. Year 1971-72

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether possession of heroin in contravention of the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, can be treated to be stock-in-trade possessed by a medical practitioner ?

Avijit Das / November 29, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench CIT vs. Dr. T.A. Qureshi Section 37, Expln. Asst. Year 1986-87 A.M.

Kerala H.C : whether s. 147(a) or s. 147(b) will apply if the notice was issued before the amendment in 1989

Avijit Das / November 26, 2004

High Court Of Kerala Varkey Jacob & Co. vs. CIT & Anr. Sections 147, 147(b), 149 Asst. Year 1979-80, 1980-81,

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 4 … 8 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top