272 ITR

Section 40

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the land and building, a portion of which was let out and a portion of which was occupied by the assessee are to be treated as the assets of the assessee’s business and hence, not hit by the provisions of s. 40 of the Finance Act, 1983 ?

High Court Of Madras Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Fagun Estates (P) Ltd. Section 1983FA 40(3)(vi) P.D. Dinakaran & K.

Section 147, Section 148, Section 149

Rajasthan H.C : This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dt. 16th March, 2004, rendered in SB Civil Writ Petn. No. 6962 of 2003 [reported as Banswara Syntex Ltd. vs. Asstt. CIT (2004) 188 CTR (Raj) 457—Ed.] whereby the writ petition was allowed and the notice issued under s. 148

High Court Of Rajasthan Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Banswara Syntex Ltd. Sections 147, 148, 149(1)(b), ART. 226 Asst.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security