Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

272 ITR

Rajasthan H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the interest on amount advanced to M/s Citric India Ltd., Bombay as per the agreement letter dt. 27th July, 1965, had accrued to the assessee-company following the mercantile system of accounting ?

Avijit Das / July 23, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench S.M.S. Investment Corpn. (P) Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 5 Asst. Year 1973-74 Y.R. […]

Rajasthan H.C : Whether the non-maintenance of brand-wise record of sales of Deshi Ghee can be a ground for rejection of accounts under s. 145(3) particularly when the purchase and sales are duly vouched and audited and the stock is maintained?

Avijit Das / July 18, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan Narsinghdas Ramakishan Pungaliya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Sections 145(3) Asst. Year 1990-91 Y.R. Meena

Income Tax Case Laws

Rajasthan H.C : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in holding that the estate left by the deceased belonged to the HUF and only value of 1/4th share therein is assessable to estate duty in the hands of the Accountable Person.

Avijit Das / July 9, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench Controller Of Estate Duty vs. Inder Jeet Singh Sections ED 5 Y.R. Meena

Sec. 260A, Section 260

Rajasthan H.C : Whether the Tribunal was justified in having restored an addition of Rs. 1,00,000 on account of undisclosed stocks etc. on a purely ad hoc basis without assigning any rhyme, reason or basis for the same ?

Avijit Das / May 26, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench Shri Girraj Industries vs. Union Of India & Ors. Sections 260A Y.R. Meena

Rajasthan H.C : Whether the Tribunal has committed a manifest error of law in rejecting the prayer of the appellant for raising additional ground on the premise that such additional ground was raised after the expiry of prescribed time-limit for filing appeal before the Tribunal?

Avijit Das / May 22, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan Madad Lal Ansari vs. DCIT Sections 253 Asst. Year 1994-95 N.N. Mathur & K.K. Acharya, JJ.

Rajasthan H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in sustaining an addition of Rs. 85,000 as made by the AO being unexplained investment in the purchases under s. 69 of the IT Act, 1961, and whether the finding of the Tribunal is perverse ?

Avijit Das / May 21, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench Radhakishan Ramniranjan vs. CIT & Anr. Sections 69 Asst. Year 1990-91 Y.R. Meena

Sec. 28(i), Section 22

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the rental income derived from the leasing out of the property at Cathedral Road, Madras, should be assessed under the head “profits and gains of business or profession” only and not under the head “income from house property” ?

Avijit Das / November 26, 2002

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Sanmar Holdings Ltd. Sections 22, 28(i) Asst. Year 1984-85, 1985-86, 1986-87 N.V. Balasubramanian &

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 12 13

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top