Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

267 ITR

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The petitioner has filed this petition challenging the action of respondent No. 2, who has attached the bank account for recovery of the income-tax due against the petitioner in continuation to the assessment order passed by respondent No. 2, against which appeal is pending before respondent No. 4.

Avijit Das / April 7, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh OM Travels vs. CIT & Ors. Sections 220 K.K. Lahoti, J. Writ Petn. No. 1480 […]

Allahabad H.C : The petitioner is the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Bulandshahr, which has been constituted under the UP Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964.

Avijit Das / April 5, 2004

High Court Of Allahabad Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Bulandshahr vs. Union Of India & Anr. Sections 10(20) Asst. Year 2003-2004

Section 32, Section 32A, Section 80-I

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the finding of the CIT(A) that the assessee was eligible for deduction under s. 32A of the IT Act, 1961?

Avijit Das / April 2, 2004

High Court Of Madras CIT vs. Vijay Granites (P) Ltd. Section 32A, 80-I Asst. Year 1986-87, 1987-88, 1988-89 A.S. Venkatachalamoorthy

Section 80HHC, Section 80HHF

Bombay H.C : Whether or not the appellant-assessee (hereinafter referred to as the “assessee”) was entitled to claim deduction under Section 80HHC, or in the alternative, under Section 80-O of the IT Act, 1961

Avijit Das / March 29, 2004

High Court Of Bombay Abdulgafar A. Nadiadwala vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors. Sections 80HHC, 80HHF Asst. Year

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Challenge in this writ petition is to the validity of notice under s. 148 of the IT Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’), dt. 31st March, 2003 by which proceedings under s. 147

Avijit Das / March 26, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Shripal Jain vs. Income Tax Officer Civil Writ Petn. No. 1444 of 2004 Sections

Section 220, Section 237, Section 244

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The petitioner has received a refund voucher from the Department on account as principal and interest under s. 244(1A)

Avijit Das / March 23, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Kashmir Singh Bhangal vs. Income Tax Officer & Anr. Sections 220(2), 237, 244(1A) N.K.

Section 225, Section 226

Gauhati H.C : Heard Dr. A. K. Saraf, the learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. U. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the respondent-IT Department.

Avijit Das / March 19, 2004

High Court Of Gauhati Gangabani Mercantile & Finance (P) Ltd. & Anr. vs. CIT & Ors. Section 225, 226 P.G.

Sec. 5(2), Sec. 9(1)(i), Sec. 9(1)(vi), Sec. 9(1)(Vii)

Karnataka H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the engineering fees received/receivable by the assessee was in the nature of fees for technical services in accordance with the definition of “fees for technical services” as given in cl. (4) ofthe art. VIIIA of the amended DTAA between the Republic of India and the Federal Republic of Germany?

Avijit Das / March 17, 2004

High Court Of Karnataka AEG Aktiengesllschaft vs. CIT Sections 5(2), 9(1)(i), 9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), 90(2), DTAA between India and Germany ART.

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Challenge in this petition is to the letter issued by the Asstt. CIT, Patiala, dt. 12th March, 2004, Annex. P.2, whereby the estimate, filed by the petitioner, has been rejected and it has been required to pay advance tax in accordance with the order under s. 210(3) of the IT Act, 1961 (for short the Act), dt. 19th Feb., 2004.

Avijit Das / March 16, 2004

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Punjab Tractors Ltd. & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Sections

Madhya Pradesh H.C : This Hon’ble Court be kindly pleased to stay the recovery proceedings till the disposal of first appeal pending before the CIT(A)-II, Jabalpur.

Avijit Das / March 12, 2004

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Jain Cycle Spares & Co. vs. CIT & ORS. Sections 220 Asst. Year 1997-98 K.K.

Post pagination

← Previous 1 2 3 … 12 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top