Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

267 ITR

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the deduction under s. 80-I is to be granted on the gross total income and not on the income reduced by the amount allowed under s. 80HH of the IT Act, 1961?

Avijit Das / September 13, 2002

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CIT vs. M.P. State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. Section 80-I S.K. Kulshrestha & S.L. Jain, […]

Gujarat H.C : Whether the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the income earned from the firm belonged to Rangraj Keshrimal Family Trust and thereby deleting the said income from the income of the assessee?

Avijit Das / August 29, 2002

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Rangraj Keshumal Sections 4 A.R. Dave & D. A. Mehta, JJ. IT Ref. No.

Delhi H.C : Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was correct in holding that the amount received by the assessee on surrender of tenancy rights, amounting to Rs. 6,83,017, is a casual and non-recurring receipt under s. 10(3) of the IT Act not chargeable to tax ?

Avijit Das / August 13, 2002

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Eicher Goodearth Ltd. Section 260A D.K. Jain & Ms. Sharda Aggarwal, JJ. IT Appeal

Section 147, Section 148

Gujarat H.C : We are informed that the machineries were installed in the previous year relevant to asst. yr. 1984-85

Avijit Das / June 19, 2002

High Court Of Gujarat Mamta Type Setting Works vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Sections 32A(5), 147, 148 Asst. Year

Sec. 23(1A), Sec.16(1)(a), Section 16, Section 23, Wealth Tax Act

Bombay H.C : This appeal under s. 27A of the WT Act, 1957 (‘the Act’) is directed against the order of the Tribunal, Mumbai Bench ‘B’, in IT Appeal No. 44/Mum/1997, dt. 8th Oct., 1999, holding that s. 23 (1A)(a) of the Act provides for a right of appeal against an intimation issued under s. 16(1)(a)(i) of the Act so as to object to the amount of new wealth determined under the Act

Avijit Das / April 3, 2002

High Court Of Bombay Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Apar Ltd. Sections WT 16(1)(a), WT 23(1A) Asst. Year 1992-93 V.C.

Bombay H.C : The petitioner is a Karta of Maneklal D. Shah, HUF which is carrying on proprietary business of dealing in polyester yarn in the name of M/s Amsons Export Corpn

Avijit Das / February 8, 2002

High Court Of Bombay Maneklal D. Shah vs. P.K. Gupta, CIT Sections 273A, WT 18B Asst. Year 1972-73, 1974-75, 1976-77,

Sec. 28(iv), Section 28

Gujarat H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that amount of Rs.1,77,052 arising from the remission in the unsecured liability, is not taxable in the hands of the assessee?

Avijit Das / October 23, 2001

High Court Of Gujarat CIT vs. Chetan Chemicals (P) Ltd. Sections 28(iv), 41(1) Asst. Year 1982-83 M.S. Shah & D.A.

Section 147, Section 148

Andhra Pradesh H.C : The petition seeks a writ of prohibition against respondents in respect of notice issued under s. 147 (a) of the IT Act. The facts stated by the petitioner are that there was originally a firm carrying on a business of manufacture and sale of Beedies.

Avijit Das / January 2, 1998

High Court Of Andhra Pradesh G.B. Bros. & Konda Rajagopala Chetty Beedi Factory (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Sections 147(a), 148

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 11 12

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top