Tag: 264 ITR

Gujarat H.C : Notice to the respondents. Since the constitutional validity of the Ordinance dt. 16th Oct., 2003, is challenged, notice to the Attorney General of India.

High Court Of Gujarat Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bar Association vs. Union Of India Section Art. 123, Art. 323B Bhawani Singh, C.J. & J.N. Bhatt, J. Special Civil Applns. Nos. 15990 to 15993 of 2003 17th November, 2003 Counsel Appeared M.J. Thakore with K.H. Kaji, Mihir Joshi with Manish J. Shah, S.N. Soparkar with Mrs. Swati …

Uttaranchal H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was legally justified in holding that free accommodation facility provided by the employer to its employees on board the rig in high seas cannot be construed to be perquisite ?

High Court Of Uttaranchal CIT & Anr. vs. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. Sections 17(2)(iii), 201(1A) Asst. Year 1994-95 S.H. Kapadia, C.J. & M.M. Ghildiyal, J. IT Appeal Nos. 12, 13 & 15 of 2003 14th October, 2003 Counsel Appeared S.K. Posti, for the Appellants : O.P. Sapra i/b V.K. Bisht, for the Respondent JUDGMENT S. …

Allahabad H.C : The statement that the Director of Inspection has sufficient material in his possession to believe that the person to whom summons or notice was issued was in possession of money, bullion or jewellery or other valuable articles or things is a mere reproduction of the section

High Court Of Allahabad Smt. Kavita Agarwal & Anr. vs. Director Of Income Tax (Investigation) & Ors. Sections 132(1) M. Katju & Umeshwar Pandey, JJ. Civil Misc. Writ Petn. No. 1205 of 2001 10th October, 2003 Counsel Appeared S.P. Gupta & Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal, for the Petitioners : Bharatji Agarwal, for the Respondents JUDGMENT M. KATJU, …

Madras H.C : The petitioner in the above writ petitions, claiming himself as a partner of Rajendra Silks, a partnership firm registered before the Registrar of Firms, Erode, sought for the certified copies of the P&L a/c of the said firm, filed by the managing partner before the respondent income-tax authorities

High Court Of Madras K. Muthukrishnan vs. Income Tax Officer & Ors. Sections 138 Asst. Year 1997-98, 1999-2000 P.D. Dinakaran, J. Writ Petn. Nos. 42073 to 42075 of 2003 9th October, 2003 Counsel Appeared Murali Kumaran, for the Petitioner : K. Subramanian, for the Respondents JUDGMENT P.D. DINAKARAN, J. : The petitioner in the above writ …

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether the arrangement arrived at between the parties was not genuine and whether it had been adopted only with a view to deprive the Revenue of the tax due or was it a genuine arrangement.

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. R.B.L. Banarsi Dass & Co. (P) Ltd. Section 260A Asst. Year 1990-91 N.K. Sodhi & Virender Singh, JJ. IT Appeal No. 122 of 2002 3rd October, 2003 Counsel Appeared : R.P. Sawhney with N.G. Sharma, for the Appellant JUDGMENT N. K. sodhi, J. : This appeal under s. …

Uttaranchal H.C : On 31st Dec., 1990, ONGC filed a return under s. 160(1)(i) r/w s. 163(1)(c) as agent of Cooper Engineering Services International declaring a net income of Rs. 3.69 lakhs.

High Court Of Uttaranchal CIT & Anr. vs. O.N.G.C. Sections 28(iv), 44BB, 195A Asst. Year 1990-91 S.H. Kapadia, C.J. & Irshad Hussain, J. IT Appeal Nos. 343, 470, 471 & 518 of 2001 and 22 of 2003 30th September, 2003 Counsel Appeared S.K. Posti, for the Appellants : R. Muralidhar, for the Respondent JUDGMENT S. H. …

Delhi H.C : The petitioner has also been informed that any default in payment in terms of the said letter would invite action for recovery as per the procedure prescribed under the Act and the Board circulars.

High Court Of Delhi Maruti Udyog Ltd. vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Sections 220(6) Asst. Year 2000-01 D.K. Jain & Madan B. Lokur, JJ. Civil Writ Petn. No. 6412 of 2003 & Civil Misc. No. 11213 of 2003 30th September, 2003 Counsel Appeared P. Chidambaram with C.S. Agarwal & Arjun Pant, for the Petitioner : …
Malcare WordPress Security