234 ITR

Sec. 2(42A)

Bombay H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the value of the assessee’s right of occupation as a tenant should be treated as a part of the cost of the flat even though this right has merged in the bigger estate at the time of the purchase of the remaining rights over the flat for the purpose of computing the surplus liable to capital gains tax?

High Court Of Bombay CIT vs. Dr. D.A. Irani Section 2(42A) Asst. Year 1977-78 Dr. B.P. Saraf & A.Y. Sakhare, […]

Sec. 36(1)(iii), Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Karnataka H.C : The assessee is an exhibitor of films and running a theatre called “Nanda Picture House” since 1972. The assessee is an HUF which purchased a site at Mandya in the year 1972 and commenced construction of another theatre “Gurusree” on the said site. He borrowed funds from the Karnataka Bank Ltd., Mandya, for purposes of construction.

High Court Of Karnataka CIT vs. H.C. Shankarappa Sections 36(1)(iii), 37(1) Asst. Years 1981-82, 1982-83, 1983-84, 1984-85 Ashok Bhan &

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security