Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

182 ITR

Sec. 142(1), Sec. 143(3)

Kerala H.C : The petitioner wants to quash exhibits P- 2, P-4 and P-5. On 11th July, 1985, there was a search by the Central Excise Department and there was also a test production by the Central Excise Department on 1st Oct., 1985.

Avijit Das / January 11, 1990

High Court Of Kerala Priya Rubber Industries (P.) Ltd. vs. ITO Sections 143(2), 142(1), 142(2) Asst. Year 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86 […]

Gift Tax Act, Section 26, Section 6

Delhi H.C : The question involved in this case pertains to the valuation of a plot of land which was gifted by the respondent to his grandson.

Avijit Das / January 11, 1990

High Court Of Delhi Commissioner Of Gift Tax vs. Dr. (Kaviraj) Khajan Chand Sections GT 6, GT 26 B.N. Kirpal

Income Tax Case Laws

Patna H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the order passed by the Asstt. CED under s. 61 of the ED Act, 1953, is appealable under s. 62 of the Act ?

Avijit Das / January 10, 1990

High Court Of Patna Controller Of Estate Duty vs. Haribux Poddar (Decd.) Sections ED 61, ED 62, ED 62(1)(b) G.

Sec. 2(m), Sec. 2(q), Section 3, Section 7, Wealth Tax Act

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order of the CWT (Appeals) directing the valuation of shares of M/s Gedore Tools India P. Ltd. on yield basis as against the value of the shares worked out in accordance with r. 1D of the WT Rules ?

Avijit Das / January 10, 1990

High Court Of Delhi Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Sharbati Devi Jhalani Sections WT 2(m), WT 2(q), WT 3, WT

Sec. 2(e), Sec. 2(m), Wealth Tax Act

Patna H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the intangible additions made in the income-tax proceedings could be treated as the assets of the assessee for the purpose of wealth-tad assessment in the light of the provisions of s. 2(e) and (m) of the WT Act, 1957 ?

Avijit Das / January 9, 1990

High Court Of Patna Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Mishrilal Jain Sections WT 2(e), WT 2(m) Asst. Year1976-77 G.G. Sohani,

Delhi H.C : Whether the Tribunal was legally correct in deleting the directions of the CWT (A) that the assessment should be rectified by substituting the amount finally payable by the Court in respect of compensation ?

Avijit Das / January 9, 1990

High Court Of Delhi Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Attar Singh Section WT 35 B.N. Kirpal & C.L. Chaudhary, JJ.

Sec. 256(2), Section 256, Section 68

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in directing that the additions made on account of unexplained cash credits would not be called unexplained cash credits under s. 68 of the Act ?

Avijit Das / January 9, 1990

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Smt. Usha Jain Sections 68, 256(2) B.N. Kirpal & C.L. Chaudhry, JJ. IT Case

Kerala H.C : The petitioner purchased 17 cents of land at Trivandrum in 1967 with his own funds. He is an assessee to income- tax ever since 1967-68.

Avijit Das / January 5, 1990

High Court Of Kerala N.S. Vijayaraghavan vs. CIT & Anr. Section 222 K.S. Paripoornan, J. Original Petn. No. 569 of

Sec. 256(2), Section 256

Allahabad H.C : The assessee along with his brother had purchased a leasehold plot at Ghaziabad and constructed a building thereon.

Avijit Das / January 2, 1990

High Court Of Allahabad CIT vs. Raj Kumar Section 256(2) R.M. Sahai & Dr. R.R. Misra, JJ. IT Appln. No.

Sec. 27(3), Section 27, Wealth Tax Act

Allahabad H.C : The submission made by learned standing counsel that the fist valuer’s report was not taken into consideration has no substance

Avijit Das / January 1, 1990

High Court Of Allahabad Commissioner Of Wealth Tax Vs. Sadi Ram Ganga Prasad (HUF) Sections WT 27, WT 27(3) R.M.

Post pagination

1 2 … 8 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top