XML Sitemap

This is a XML Sitemap which is supposed to be processed by search engines which follow the XML Sitemap standard like Ask.com, Bing, Google and Yahoo.
It was generated using the WordPress content management system and the Google Sitemap Generator Plugin by Arne Brachhold.
You can find more information about XML sitemaps on sitemaps.org and Google's list of sitemap programs.

URLPriorityChange frequencyLast modified (GMT)
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-mumbai-where-assessee-purchased-from-market-talc-powder-and-repacked-it-into-small-pack-and-after-putting-its-brand-name-sold-same-as-cement-water-proofing-compound-if-talc-powder-purchased/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:34
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-new-delhi-where-assessee-procured-various-electrical-items-and-accessories-from-market-and-sold-them-to-clients-in-various-combinations-bpl-kit-and-it-had-mounted-two-or-more-items-like-dp-2/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-new-delhi-where-assessee-procured-various-electrical-items-and-accessories-from-market-and-sold-them-to-clients-in-various-combinations-bpl-kit-and-it-had-mounted-two-or-more-items-like-dp/20%Monthly2019-07-29 08:23
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhara-pradesh-telangana-the-tribunal-is-correct-in-law-in-confirming-the-order-u-s-201-1-read-with-section-2011a-ignoring-the-fact-that-the-appellant-was-under-a-bona-fide-impression-that/20%Monthly2019-03-12 08:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhra-pradesh-h-c-the-commissioner-acted-beyond-the-scope-of-powers-conferred-to-him-under-sec-263-of-the-income-tax-act-in-passing-the-impugned-order-and-whether-the-order-of-the-commissioner-sat/20%Monthly2019-04-13 12:31
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-new-delhi-where-applicant-purchases-a-residential-house-abroad-in-assessment-year-2012-13-out-of-capital-gain-on-sale-of-inherited-property-in-india-within-two-years-from-date-of-sale-he-has-to/20%Monthly2018-12-17 05:46
https://taxcaselaw.com/bombay-h-c-where-contract-of-applicant-was-essentially-a-contract-for-supply-of-equipments-merely-because-there-was-small-element-of-work-same-would-not-be-a-works-contract-sale-of-materials-were/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:40
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-where-a-notice-has-been-served-on-a-defaulter-under-rule-2-the-defaulter-or-his-representative-in-interest-shall-not-be-competent-to-mortgage-charge-lease-or-otherwise-deal-with-any-p/20%Monthly2019-08-29 12:27
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-where-assessee-was-following-mercantile-system-of-accounting-interest-accrued-to-it-on-fixed-deposits-was-to-be-brought-to-tax-in-relevant-year-itself-even-though-maturity-period-or-expi/20%Monthly2018-12-25 06:53
https://taxcaselaw.com/gujarat-h-c-direct-labour-charges-are-not-covered-by-the-provisions-of-section-40aia-of-the-income-tax-act-1961-despite-the-fact-that-there-is-no-employer-employee-relation-between-the-labourer/20%Monthly2019-04-16 07:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/andhara-pradesh-telangana-h-c-the-honble-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-is-right-in-sustaining-the-order-of-the-cit-appeals-who-confirmed-the-order-of-the-assessing-authority-treating-the-entir/20%Monthly2019-06-17 06:17
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-whether-the-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-was-justified-in-deleting-the-penalty-under-section-2711/20%Monthly2019-08-29 12:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-there-is-no-manufacture-in-the-production-of-ready-mix-concrete-when-the-rmc-itself-is-an-excisable-commodity-goods-on-which-credit-is-also-available-for-inputs/20%Monthly2019-08-30 11:41
https://taxcaselaw.com/aar-new-delhi-where-applicant-an-indian-company-entered-into-two-agreements-with-a-french-company-for-offshore-equipment-supply-and-for-supervision-of-installation-services-no-income-from-offshore/20%Monthly2018-12-17 05:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/patna-h-c-the-appellants-case-confirmation-of-addition-u-s-69a-amounting-to-rs-10471720-is-legal-and-valid/20%Monthly2019-08-31 11:26
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-hank-yarn-packing-notification-issued-by-ministry-of-textiles-government-of-india-is-to-protect-handloom-weavers-and-under-said-statutory-notification-term-yarn-has-been-defined-o/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:43
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-where-assessee-a-real-estate-developer-claimed-expenditure-incurred-for-making-land-suitable-for-sale-and-expenditure-was-supported-by-documents-seized-at-time-of-search-benefit-of-presu/20%Monthly2018-12-17 05:50
https://taxcaselaw.com/cestat-bangalore-bench-frp-composite-doors-and-frames-made-from-solid-block-of-sale-wood-on-which-skin-of-fibre-reinforced-material-was-glued-are-classifiable-under-tariff-heading-no-4410-19-as-art/20%Monthly2019-07-29 06:06
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-a-part-demand-in-show-cause-notice-was-not-maintainable-while-other-demands-were-maintainable-in-view-of-expiry-of-limitation-period-in-issuing-fresh-notice-impugned-show-cause-notice-wa/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-even-where-there-were-scrutiny-assessments-reassessment-would-be-permissible-if-in-succeeding-year-assessing-officer-noticed-that-though-there-was-merger-amalgamation-assessee-had-in-c/20%Monthly2018-12-28 06:07
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-expression-agro-processing-industry-would-not-include-food-processing-industry-assessee-bakery-would-not-be-entitled-to-claim-deferment-or-remission-of-tax-payable/20%Monthly2019-07-29 09:47
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-unutilized-modvat-credit-of-earlier-years-amounting-to-rs-775578738-adjusted-in-the-assessment-year-in-question-should-be-treated-as-actual-payment-of-excise-duty-under-section-43b-of/20%Monthly2019-04-09 11:22
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-duty-drawback-had-not-accrued-and-become-payable-to-the-assessee-and-cannot-be-included-in-the-taxable-income-of-the-assessee-for-the-assessment-year-1999-2000/20%Monthly2019-04-09 11:12
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-where-assessee-trust-formed-for-promotion-of-interest-of-non-resident-keralites-received-income-from-certification-bank-interest-etc-which-was-not-spent-for-charitable-purpose-mere-fac/20%Monthly2018-09-17 10:11
https://taxcaselaw.com/calcutta-h-c-the-same-belonged-to-the-3-wives-of-the-assessee-and-relying-on-the-3-returns-filed-by-the-3-wives-under-the-presumptive-tax-scheme-but-after-the-completion-of-block-assessments-whereas/20%Monthly2019-09-03 10:10
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-where-object-of-respective-subsidy-schemes-of-state-governments-was-to-encourage-development-of-multiple-theatre-complexes-incentives-would-be-held-to-be-capital-in-nature-and-not-revenue-recei/20%Monthly2018-12-17 06:48
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-amount-of-1-crore-was-never-shown-in-the-profit-and-loss-account-hence-assessee-is-entitle-to-relief-without-examining-the-fact-that-the-assessee-had-suppressed-the-sales-intentio/20%Monthly2019-08-28 09:42
https://taxcaselaw.com/allahabad-h-c-the-honble-itat-has-not-expressed-any-opinion-or-given-any-finding-in-respect-of-the-written-submissions-filed-before-the-bench-through-the-dr-drawing-attention-to-the-amended-provi/20%Monthly2019-03-08 10:28
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-assessee-society-charitable-society-established-benefit-particular-religious-community-caste-thereby-violation-section-13-1-b-act/20%Monthly2019-01-02 12:44
https://taxcaselaw.com/delhi-h-c-whether-the-itat-erred-in-law-in-confirming-the-disallowance-of-the-amount-of-rs-32783128-deposited-by-the-appellant-in-its-central-excise-personal-ledger-account-pla-before-31st-mar/20%Monthly2019-08-29 07:49
https://taxcaselaw.com/kerala-h-c-the-appellate-tribunal-was-right-in-confirming-the-disallowance-of-expenses-incurred-for-construction-of-buildings-in-leased-out-lands-as-capital-expenditure/20%Monthly2019-04-13 11:55
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-any-person-being-the-assessee-has-entered-into-an-international-transaction-in-any-previous-year-and-the-assessing-officer-considers-it-necessary-or-expedient-so-to-do-he-may-w/20%Monthly2019-09-03 10:57
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-even-though-eligible-business-is-given-benefit-of-deduction-under-section-80-ib-on-account-of-assessee-satisfying-conditions-mentioned-in-sub-section-2-of-section-80-ib-yet-benefit-of-said-de/20%Monthly2018-12-17 06:37
https://taxcaselaw.com/s-c-high-court-proceeded-decide-revenues-appeal-without-formulating-substantial-question-law-order-passed-set-aside/20%Monthly2019-01-02 12:39
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-assessees-case-was-transferred-from-one-place-to-another-in-same-city-in-view-of-provisions-of-sub-section-3-of-section-127-assessee-could-not-plead-for-an-opportunity-of-hear/20%Monthly2019-04-20 11:24
https://taxcaselaw.com/madras-h-c-where-there-was-a-seizure-of-case-u-s-132-132a-and-the-assessee-had-no-other-source-to-pay-the-advance-tax-other-tnan-the-cash-seized-and-the-cash-was-not-allowed-to-be-utilised-to-pay-th/20%Monthly2019-08-29 10:32